this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
490 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

87450 readers
3281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 268 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And I've given up on Facebook ages ago. You should too.

[–] h_ramus@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've also deleted WhatsApp when they changed their terms to some bullshit data sharing or something. It's tough when everyone and businesses use WhatsApp as the only means of communication. Average person doesn't even think about tech providers and we're all worse off getting swept in the tide of ignorance.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 160 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

The dev comments say a lot:

https://old.reddit.com/user/paintboth1234

No one helping the project ever said "uBO is living on a secluded isle". It's a public community FOSS project, for over a decade, monitored and contributed by every user and volunteer. Every site has been watching uBO for years. It's not new. And yes, if users do nothing to help, either on helping uBO's side or leaving the trash sites, and just give snarky comments instead, this will happen.

The message is clear to me; UBO devs are sick of a sick of a sea of users constantly complaining about imperfect Facebook blocking, who won’t contribute anything nor lift a finger to limit/adapt their own usage. They’re sick of slaving away fighting six-figure-salary Facebook devs, whose only job is to counter adblock, where UBO’s only compensation is more pretentious complaints.


It’s not a technical limitation, persay. It kinda a “Why are we doing this to ourselves? If you all want us to support Facebook, fine; we welcome PRs.”

Which is totally fair.

To me, it sounds like UBO could drop other overtly hostile sites, too. As they should.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the Meta devs find their work drying up as a result and are risking a layoff, they could always contribute anonymously to keep the racket going perpetually.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The comments on Reddit are fucking insane, they literally read like they're from Facebook itself.

Lemmy / the Fediverse is far from perfect but I'm so glad the discussions here aren't so entitled and selfish.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alastel@lemmy.ml 150 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can't they just block facebook.com as whole and call it a day ?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

The perfect solution.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

I agree. Make a pop-up and tell the user Facebook is determined to monetize and track every moment they're on the site. If they want to continue they'll get an unfiltered experience and may God have mercy on their souls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

U wonder what kind if person thinks "you know what, today I will go in an make the world a little bit worse than it was before"...I simply cannot understand how people are willingly working at a place like Meta.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 157 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago

I think the guy from idiocracy was a better choice but this is accurate too lol

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Not to defend them too much but I'd assume that a lot of the employees are just trying to make a living. The department I'm working at was recently taken over and I have a mortgage and a kid so even if I morally disagree with some of the practices of my new employer I can't just quit without uprooting the lives of my family.

It's the same for the majority of workers stuck in big corporate jobs. The capitalist orphan crushing machine will crush all in the end. Not just the orphans.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No single drop considers itself responsible for the flood.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Waterpumpee@lemmus.org 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a dev i can tell you the current job market is hell. If you like to feed you and your family meta is likely one of the better options currently. We are expected to do courses in our free time, watch the infrastructure on weekends while earning less than cashiers. Why i stay in this field? I already changed a field. I have two bachelors. Im tired.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I simply cannot understand how people are willingly working at a place like Meta.

The same reason people are willing to napalm brown kids for Uncle Sam, a chance at a better life, price be damned. People will find a way to justify their life choices one way or another but it really comes down to wanting food and shelter. Yes, I realize that's an extreme example but I hope you understand the point i'm trying to make. We live in a fucked up world that pits us against each other. When we fight each other, we're too busy to fight our oppressors.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stop wasting effort and block all facebook ads with this one weird trick. Slop devs hate him!

[–] verifiedbyme@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I blocked all those on the router-side for a while. Suddenly I couldn’t take calls on WhatsApp anymore. Makes you wonder, dunnit?

I also only have one friend left who I can’t get to move to Signal. Motherfucker is gonna get an ultimatum from me soon, I’m tired of Meta and their shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Squibbles@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Careful, this is how you make the key cards to the server room stop working 😆

[–] housedogpartyfavor@lemmy.zip 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know a way you can never see a Facebook ad ever again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jerry@feddit.online 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This is going to attract more interest in using Facebook advertising to deliver malware, knowing that the attack surface will grow substantially soon.

Without ad blocking, Facebook will become a dangerous place to visit if not done so within some sort of sandboxing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

I get the reasoning, but this is pretty sad. My older parents are frequently more and more fooled by sponsored Facebook posts with some fake product they want to buy, then all of a sudden they have "YOUR COMPUTER HAS BEEN HACKED" notification spam that takes up half their screen. It's not to a ridiculous degree, maybe 3 times a year on average, but it's happening more often recently.

I use uBlock Origin to keep them safe. If this starts not blocking any ads, I'm not sure what else to do. Is Brave going to keep up?

"Get them off Facebook" isn't an option. They're old, and it's how they connect with their friends and get fulfilment. As disgusting as Facebook is, it's too far gone at this point, I can't take that away from them.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 19 points 1 week ago

I don't know if you saw this post yet, but at least somebody is maintaining a Facebook filter list. Hopefully that means you can keep using uBO in peace, provided the right lists are enabled.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The most annoying thing is... People can use more than one app. You can say "well, if you wanna talk to me, I'll be on this messenger here." And thats how you get them through the door.

It's really shouldn't be that hard, yet it feels like asking someone to pull their teeth out.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Has everyone forgotten about F.B. Purity (Fluff Busting Purity)? It's a browser extension that lets you customize the entire interface of Facebook. It's been around for 17 years and still works just fine.

I use it to remove not only ads, but FB games, marketplace, reels/videos, suggestions/featured content, FB Messenger, etc. I pretty much locked down my Facebook interface to only show me posts from my friends in the order that they were posted, with the latest at the top of my feed. Just like Facebook used to be before it started shoving useless content in your face.

The only reason I still have a Facebook account is because 90% of my friends, family, and contacts I've made over a lifetime of global travels, are all on Facebook. If I need to get in touch with someone, Facebook is where I'll find them. But I don't post anything to Facebook anymore; I rarely log on to it.

There isn't another social media program where I can find everyone I know without subscribing to even more junk. I won't use Instagram, Snapchat, Whatsapp, TikTok, or any of the other corporate social media programs, and most people I know/knew in person don't use or understand the Fediverse.

Bluesky and Discord are as corporate as I'll tolerate, and I'm already on the lookout for replacements for both. I used to have a Mastodon account a decade ago, before the Fediverse was a common thing, but I have no idea what site I built an account on. I might have to just suck it up and rebuild my account somewhere else. And there are plenty of Discord clones out there, but none quite as functional as Discord yet...

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Not that I use Facebook myself, but I think this was a misstep in the U block team.

All this did was tell the major companies out there that the only thing they have to do to make it so u block origins no longer works on their site is to make it extremely tedious for the team working on the project to make filters. So I expect that now that they've officially dropped support for Facebook, the other major sites are going to look at how Facebook is doing it, and they're going to adopt a similar systems

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] glowie@infosec.pub 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yall still using that shit?

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What's wrong with ublock origin?

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think they meant facebook

[–] glowie@infosec.pub 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nightlily@leminal.space 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why the fuck do articles like this keep using that Pirat_Nation Twitter account as a source? They’re a far right culture warrior who never actually links to the original reporting.

[–] katze@lemmy.4d2.org 13 points 1 week ago

That "article" is obviously AI generated; that whole page should be blocked from this community.

[–] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Let me preface this by saying that I am generally against AI and I hate LLMs being pushed everywhere, but I currently hate facebook and social media even more than AI.

I think that ad blocking might actually be a good use of a model trained to detect ads: AI models are "black boxes" and it would make it difficult for facebook to find out precisely how the detection works and workaround it. Imagine a tiny classifier running locally, whose only job is to look at a post html or resulting rendered pixels and detecting if it's an ad or not, and then generating the blocking rules.

It would be quite cool, because it would work on any website without an explicit list of ad-blocking rules that somebody needs to maintain.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

This was a thing long before the AI craze: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9152669

AdGraph differs from existing approaches by building a graph representation of the HTML structure, network requests, and JavaScript behavior of a webpage, and using this unique representation to train a classifier for identifying advertising and tracking resources... We evaluate AdGraph on the Alexa top-10K websites, and find that it is highly accurate, able to replicate the labels of human-generated filter lists with 95.33% accuracy, and can even identify many mistakes in filter lists.

They made a Chrome extension, in 2020: https://github.com/uiowa-irl/AdGraph

But practically, it's tricky because:

  • It still needs to load and render the ads. Not undoable; Adnauseum does this, but its a much more performance-intense approach.

  • There's always the risk of unpredictably blocking legitimate elements.

  • Image/text classifiers aren't actually black boxes. Hence there were also adversarial measures against this... before the AI craze: https://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~zubair/files/a4-acsac2021.pdf

At the end of the day, the whole point of uBO is to be lightweight and fast. You aren't wrong about a machine-learning based approach, but its not really a fit for them IMO.


But.

I think a reasonable approach would be to have bots and agents generate adblocking rules, to be tested by humans, then shipped to users of various adblocking engines.

The engineering is far easier. Performance/latency constraints are minimal, 1 bot can maintain thousands of rules for millions of users, and it isn't necessarily availible to reverse engineer, either.

Some adblock lists must do this, already. I know they already use some automation, but I don't know the details TBH.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] donald_von_shitsnpants@kopitalk.net 28 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Who is still on Facebook anyways?

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I know you’re sounding edgy, but the answer is “a lot”. My entire family and I have probably a good 30+ friends that are active (weekly or more) on it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BuckFutter@timeyak.com 12 points 1 week ago

Businesses, so many businesses have just a facebook page, no website or anything else. Want to know what or when the next band is playing or the nightly special, check facebook. 🤷

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Senior citizens

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But if you block ads on Facebook, then what will you read? When I accidentally go to my profile, it's a post from someone I actually follow for every 20 sponsored posts. It's a website to watch ads, then every once of a while your ad viewing session is interrupted by some real content

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago

I mean why, it's not worth it. People who don't give a damn about privacy aren't interested in ad blockers—quite the opposite.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago (4 children)

i don't like the "giving up the fight" framing.

Maybe they should stop providing this service for all the big players. people might actually leave if they suffer all the ads.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's quite fine; who uses Facebook nowadays?

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The venn diagram of uBlock Origin users and Facebook users is two completely separate circles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] banazir@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Should probably just block that whole privacy nightmare of a site, to be honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tarambor@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Seems like me finally closing my Facebook account this week was timed well.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›