Langley needs to find a compromise between living and getting Luigi'd.
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
770 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
87649 readers
3291 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
They're not even watching traffic though...
Well, since you care less than zero about our safety, Langley, there will be no compromise.
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
I drove my company at the wall. Dearest wall, give me a compromise, pretty please?
the compromise could be that they should take their own cameras down then do door to door petitions on who actually wants them.
There is no compromise. Garret, You will be lucky to be alive here in a few months. The only thing you can do is beg and grovel and give back every penny you and your company earned back to the American people and in addition, take down every flock camera. And to employees of this company, run and Publicly denounce them so you have a CHANCE to be hired anywhere again.
Work with evil, die with evil.
"Lol" said the scorpion, "lmao."
Die, Flock. The company would not be missed.
I call for something else lol.
Not an inch ! Not a mm!
You have both by not having you around, asshole.
I agree, a good compromise would be life imprisonment for the CEO and every investor.
Just as a good to know, if feces (especially of unknown origin) are involved in a cleanup and restoration project, it becomes a biohazard and requires additional time and resources.
It's not a matter of privacy or safety. It's a matter of how does this technology benefit me? So far, that's none at all. I live in a place of low crime, so it's ability to keep me safer is minor if at all. Police abuse it and the upper classes seem safe from it. I do not see any benefit in it's current form. Lock it down behind court orders without general police/organizational access and maybe? But I'll still vote against it...
Fuck you, Garrett.
My privacy and freedom are invaluable to me, I don't give 2 shits about some CEOs profits. He can go rot in a ditch for all I care.
Compromise is a dirty word.
Flock off.