bagsy

joined 11 months ago
[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If they wanted people to opt in, they could, I don't know, offer to pay them instead of stealing. Its a wild concept I know.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

i agree with you. The only people that seem to be excited about LLMs are the people that make them, junior developers who can't make good software yet, and management who never cared about good software in the first place.

Good developers, and people who just need to use a computer do not care about LLMs or agents.

Who knows where it will all end. Probably somewhere not great for normal people, if I had to guess.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Its mostly used for building large software projects or doing online research into some topic. They will use the LLM to create an outline of the work to do, the let agents figure out how to to all those steps, and how to check if the answer is correct or not.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Gemini is a cool idea, but it needs just a little more functionality and decent search.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I know quite a few people who have bought into agents 100%. Its wild to hear them talk about letting an agent run for days on their personal computer, grinding away on some task. The way they talk about it, you would think they were babysitting a child or something.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Epstien worked for israel, and Maxwell's father was a spy. The whole thing was a gigantic honeypot meant to ensnare stupid politicians into toeing the line.

Its absoluety incredible than a couple decades and a few 10s of millions of dollars for party supplies was all it took to completely own the most powerful country on the planet.

It was so successful, you really have to wonder how many more of these rings exist. There is no way epstien was the only one, we only know about him because he got caught.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Can't have any science that might harm profits. /s

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Can, but won't.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you are an investor, this is a classic picks and shovels play. No one is going to be able to guess which lab puts out the best models, none of them really have a moat. However, every lab is going to need massive amounts of hardware to train and serve their models. It doenst even matter if open source models end up winning, they still need massive hardware to train and infer.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I already see lots of boutique consultancies popping up specifically saying they will fix tour slop code bases. Developers and doctors will never run out of work.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Netflix vs Google, who can cancle the most stuff I like?

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Most people dont know the cameras contain about $80 worth of copper and gold.

view more: next ›