i don't think that applies at all.
if you have no idea what you're doing, you're surely going to think all the churned out stuff is good.
leaky_shower_thought
joined 2 years ago
it's like gambling. you hope it churns out good stuff -- and some of the time, it does! lucky!
then you try your luck again. and again with small "fixes". and again.
these are the same guys with talking points about the magical invisible hand of the m~~onopoly~~arket!
meta: dem €ngag€ment$
can usher in new gold in age of science?
i think they've been doing that already. and lining their pockets with it.
The incident is unique because it was "driven, end to end, by an autonomous AI agent system,"
the incident wasn't the "cheating" part. llms are known to scour the web to look for possible solutions. i think the incident was it found a solution in another website and finding that was made by the model itself.
meanwhile, no mention of the prompt guy or the prompt.
yeah. i think that was the "normal" part of it. this always happens unless the original plot is long enough to get to another season
i think that is normal? a season is supposed to be a good enough set of stories/episodes.
is there supposed to be more to expect?
that's how i knew it was balanced ...in a fucked up way