darkmarx

joined 3 years ago
[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I always schedule them the same day if I can. Waiting between interviews does no one any good. I do a 45 minute with them for a one-on-one interview. I have a few the people they'd be working with ready to do more of a technical interview for an hour or so. If things don't go well after either, I let them know, and we part ways. If they do well, I put them in the yes pile. After one week from the first yes person, I choose the one I think best. Sometimes there is just one. When there's more, I choose the best fit and let the others know.

One time, when hiring a qa, I had two people who where both great. I really hated having to tell one of them no. A month later, a qa position opened on a different team and I passed on her resume. After she was hired, I sort of poached her from the hiring manager. She still reports to them, but she works entirely on my projects. But that's an aside.

My point is, a single interview is more than sufficient to hire anyone. The multiple interview crap, that's become so common, is done solely to stress someone out so they'll take a lower salary just to stop the stress.

Edit: Grammer

[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tell that to the student who gets expelled because they're writing was falsely identified as AI and then takes their own life.

Tell that to the person falsely identified with facial recognition and is arrested and loses their job.

Using AI to detect AI is as bad as using AI for any important decision.

This isn't hypothetical. It happens. People will lose their livelihood or die because of it. 7 in 100 is not accurate enough when any penalty is applied to detection.