Hey buddy, you didn't ask us about shit before you started installing your creepy cameras to monitor us everywhere, so you can go ahead and fuck off now.
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
770 points (98.9% liked)
Technology
87649 readers
3006 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
You don't negotiate with terrorists, Nazis, or billionaires.
Ok. You spend the rest of your life in jail, and your immediate and extended family can live.
They won't be rich. They will be held accountable if they broke the law as well.
Or we can exterminate 50-100k people to give justice to billions.
Either option is acceptable to me.
Correct, "safety" compromises our privacy. Now you're getting it, captain shithead CEO! So with that in mind, there is no way we can accept these cameras.
The rich will never feel save while we, their victims, have privacy.
They know better than even we do how much reason we have to be plotting against them.
It’s afraid
I agree. Our starting position is all flock cameras should be taken down and then shoved up Garrett Langley's ass. Every single one of them.
Now let us come to the table and find a compromise.
Need to expand from pulling down camera to pulling down Flock buildings, manufacturing sites, etc.
Can't get manufacturing sites. They are all parts bin contract manufactured from lowest bidder garbage in China as cheap as possible. Warehousing tho
load more comments
(1 replies)
Sure, the compromise is we cut them down until you stop. Sound good to everyone else?
I AGREE! There IS common Ground between allowing the Epstein Class to SPY ON CHILDREN and the People who think CHILD RAPISTS Spying on Children is WRONG! Maybe just a COUPLE MILLION of Taxpayer Dollars to Spy on Children as a Treat?
-Centrists!
They're not even watching traffic though...
Langley needs to find a compromise between living and getting Luigi'd.
I drove my company at the wall. Dearest wall, give me a compromise, pretty please?
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Die, Flock. The company would not be missed.
Not an inch ! Not a mm!
I call for something else lol.
You have both by not having you around, asshole.
It's not a matter of privacy or safety. It's a matter of how does this technology benefit me? So far, that's none at all. I live in a place of low crime, so it's ability to keep me safer is minor if at all. Police abuse it and the upper classes seem safe from it. I do not see any benefit in it's current form. Lock it down behind court orders without general police/organizational access and maybe? But I'll still vote against it...
My privacy and freedom are invaluable to me, I don't give 2 shits about some CEOs profits. He can go rot in a ditch for all I care.
Fuck you, Garrett.
You can't make a deal w/ the devil.
"I'm being paid to fuck you all " now modified to "why can't we all just get along"