Of course they didn't indict him.
I was having ribs with this dude. Couldn't have been him.
Of course they didn't indict him.
I was having ribs with this dude. Couldn't have been him.
He's not wrong. They pulled him aside without a warrant and gave him a choice with zero options: Surrender your phone data and give up your privacy, and in the current political climate they always find something that is hurtful to Donald's tender feelings, or refuse and be detained.
I made a video on Samuel's story a few weeks ago, if anyone out there hasn't heard of it.
Whether or not you regularly clear your browser data.
Eh, not me.
I'd rather get a voice note than 15 texts.
That tracks.
The more I learn about American history the more frustrated I become with our species in general. Our country could be so much more livable now, but for a handful of vulgarly wealthy people who only ever cared about number going up at any cost.
And to make it worse I'm reading a biography of John D. Rockefeller, so I'm about to hate our species just a tiny bit more.
It honestly feels very disrespectful of my time when someone sends me an AI slop response or email.
Don't be that person.
Indeed. Not having those signals to trace could make it significantly more difficult for law enforcement to identify you, and we certainly don't want the essential job of law enforcement to be inhibited.
You're welcome. I hope it's a nice day where you are.
Or is this like some government cameras that are in public spaces filming ?
It's a nationwide network of cameras used by federal, state, and local governments to track and profile people in public. It doesn't just record, but builds a database of information on every car, license plate, and person that's filmed, so it's seen to be very dystopian.
Even worse, the tech gets it wrong and mistaken identity is common, and it ends up endangering people due to the violent methods US police employ. However, it's privacy concerns that are foremost, because there's an amendment in our country's Constitution that should prohibit this kind of privacy violation.
If you'd like to learn more, I made a YT video on the topic recently.
I think vigilantism may achieve what legislators never will, because the public anger around Flock cameras is substantial.
That said, the most likely scenario in the US is that serious regulation of this tech won't materialize until a cop deletes their entire family that was hiding out after having obtained a restraining order.
I really, really hope people don't go out en masse and destroy every single Flock camera that is unconstitutionally filming and profiling them, because it would be a terrible crime to do so. Definitely do not do this people.
Facts. One of the areas where Dems/Reps always agree is that your civil liberties are their's to trample on at will.