this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
1036 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I really, really hope people don't go out en masse and destroy every single Flock camera that is unconstitutionally filming and profiling them, because it would be a terrible crime to do so. Definitely do not do this people.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Definitely don't remind people to leave their phones at home or use a Faraday bag to shield their tech.

Only the most dastardly vandals would leave their phone (and all other Bluetooth devices) at home, plugged in charging, auto-lock fully disabled, on their home WiFi, with YouTube set to auto-play a playlist. That would create a watch history that the vandal could later use to prove that they were active at home at the time of the crime. Again, you definitely shouldn’t do that.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Indeed. Not having those signals to trace could make it significantly more difficult for law enforcement to identify you, and we certainly don't want the essential job of law enforcement to be inhibited.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also people shouldn't be wearing masks. That would be make them even harder to identify for law enforcement.

People also shouldn’t pair those masks with infrared-blocking sunglasses or goggles. Because the cameras can see in infrared, and will see straight through regular darkened lenses.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Camera can still track you with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, keep that in mind

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It can't if you leave your phone and electronics at home, which you should be anyways.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

they probably are constitutional, but only because the constitution says nothing about tge government buying data from private companies.

[–] anewfox@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

yep, flock exists purely to get around the 4th amendment and the requirement to have a warrant.

[–] 5318008@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

9th amendment.

It's the best amendment, despite being, legally, the most useless.

I would argue that it was meant to cover the kind of situation where a private company is given government permission to gather surveillance data from the citizenry, in exchange for access to said data.

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People are downvoting you, but you’re right. It’s one of the reasons why the constitution is weak in the modern era, and in need of massive additions. It just is too vague, too geared towards a world that no longer exists, and hasn’t existed for over 70 years.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

they are? I guess the votes haven't federated yet

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They were, but it seems you’re being upvoted now.

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not American. What is flock? Is this like a ring doorbell? Are people suggesting to destroy personal property of their neighbours?

Or is this like some government cameras that are in public spaces filming ?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Or is this like some government cameras that are in public spaces filming ?

It's a nationwide network of cameras used by federal, state, and local governments to track and profile people in public. It doesn't just record, but builds a database of information on every car, license plate, and person that's filmed, so it's seen to be very dystopian.

Even worse, the tech gets it wrong and mistaken identity is common, and it ends up endangering people due to the violent methods US police employ. However, it's privacy concerns that are foremost, because there's an amendment in our country's Constitution that should prohibit this kind of privacy violation.

If you'd like to learn more, I made a YT video on the topic recently.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

don't forget how many of them are just straight up creep cameras, installed pointing at childrens pools, playgrounds, peoples homes, etc.

And this is why calling them “license plate readers” is hugely disingenuous, to the point of being straight up propaganda. The term vastly downplays what they can do. They don’t just scan license plates. They scan nearby devices’ Bluetooth and WiFi signals. They scan faces. They scan gait to determine specific limb proportions. They scan tattoos and birthmarks. They scan bumper stickers, dings/dents, etc… If you walk in front of a camera, it will use every trick in the book to try and figure out who you are specifically.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a revenue stream for Flock. Allowing members of the Epstein Class to view the stream of children.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

explains the millions of hits per month on the cameras.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Safety+Creep or Liberty?

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wild stuff. That is far worse than I thought was going on.

What a scary timeline and I hope the country and sort out this stuff and reform this type activity.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're not just cameras. They also log nearby mobile devices. They've gone from a few hundred nationwide to over 100,000 in like 2 years.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Uber is going to start implementing the same thing, so mobile Flock that you wouldn't be able to take down.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Someone could deploy devices that clone signals they hear and replay them at random to poison all the data. But they definitely should not do that.

[–] FLAGSHIP@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Government contracted cameras in public spaces.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just cameras. They also have RFID, WiFi, Bluetooth, and probably other crap I don't remember. The idea is that even if the face rec doesn't identify you, they still can by probing for credit cards and mobile devices. Disgusting.

[–] FLAGSHIP@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Fair point. I was trying to be succinct, not intentionally vague.

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow. Thanks for informing me. Stay safe guys

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You're welcome. I hope it's a nice day where you are.

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Canada. Its generally okay here but we do stupid shit like this too, just way less thank flock. I'm sure it'll emerge in some form.