this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
151 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 hours ago

A healthy, broadly educated population, which feels safe and secure, is incompatible with, and toxic to, conservative and authoritarian ideologies.

They need you to be sick, stupid, and scared.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 hours ago

Authoritarianism is an admission of abject weakness.

White supremacists are the weakest and most brittle snowflakes.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 40 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

He's not wrong. They pulled him aside without a warrant and gave him a choice with zero options: Surrender your phone data and give up your privacy, and in the current political climate they always find something that is hurtful to Donald's tender feelings, or refuse and be detained.

I made a video on Samuel's story a few weeks ago, if anyone out there hasn't heard of it.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 23 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Yes if they had any actionable information on him they would have already been advertising it or putting it out there. The fact that they haven't speaks volumes. This Administration would even purposefully griefly put out false information as long as it hurts people they don't like.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 3 points 55 minutes ago

There's a good chance they had information on him, but they got it illegally and needed to 'accidentally' discover the same information during a 'random' search and now they're butthurt because it didn't work.

[–] bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 hours ago

If they had anything, they'd've had a warrant.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 27 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think "at risk" is right, legal privacy protections have been a joke since 9/11, and nobody in power (We e;ected Obama to fix that and he expanded it instead) is ever going to let the control they stole in that climate of fear go.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

legal privacy protections have been a joke since 9/11

Facts. One of the areas where Dems/Reps always agree is that your civil liberties are their's to trample on at will.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 4 points 2 hours ago

If they agree iot's either bad for us, or sounds good but probably won't change anything.

Like the ROAD act that had such overwhelming bipartisan support, and sounds like a great idea, but the limits set to cub venture capital and private equity are pointless when FinCEN databases are being purged and corporate ownership no longer needs to be tracked.

And we get something good, like Biden's infrastructure program, but it ends up not going to fix crumbling roads and bridges that keep falling down or build rail infrastrructure we need, but to put up millions of ALPRs linked to shady corporations who spy on us and hand out all that data without a warrant to anyone from ICE to a data broker to a random hacker trying to steal your identity.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Such bullshit. There should be no law against deleting your data.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

There isn’t one. They are using to establish a precedent.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 3 points 2 hours ago

But then how will the apparatus of law work on you? That opinion seems like criminal behavior. You must have something to hide, or believe the apparatus of law would fabricate it, which is criminal behavior.