this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
275 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87814 readers
3304 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn't patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the "Translate Page" feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there's no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed "spammy" or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you're logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google's end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I'd be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto's. Can't really control that.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 39 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don't want to get scraped themselves?

That's the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

and you guessed it - functioning. that's the problem.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's why everyone should try and avoid google and use some alternatives.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

DuckDuck is literally right here.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 4 points 3 hours ago

Qwant, SwissCow, DuckDuckGo and many others.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

And it'll even sometimes show relevant results!

Seriously though, noai.ddg is my default, but I still have to switch to google way too often.

[–] axx@slrpnk.net 4 points 3 hours ago

Log in and your results are still clean links, so this has spread through scraper people and nobody else.

Nobody else? Screw you, corporate fanboy.

[–] raina@sopuli.xyz 16 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just switch. To anything, really.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Qwant user here for almost 2 years. (Previously used swisscow for 1 year)

[–] stevles@aussie.zone 117 points 14 hours ago (8 children)

Duck is as good as Google was before they got gimped by laws and insane levels of advertising. Have been using it religiously for months, no issues.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 9 points 8 hours ago

I've been using duck for at least 3 years, probably closer to 6 or 7. When I first used it, its searches were okay, but if I couldn't find what I was looking for a quick trip to Google would fix that. I felt like it improved slightly over some time, but also Google got a lot worse. Now with the AI proliferation, I never bother going to Google, and duck is still better than it was a year or two ago. Their AI has about a 20 or 30% success rate for me, but I just use it as a top search if I use it at all. I would love it if the results didn't change when I run the same search 2 minutes apart, though.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Kagi user for over two years now, can recommend if you’re not against paying for quality search.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 4 points 3 hours ago

Kagi is really good. I use Qwant because its free and somewhat close, but Kagi was really really good.

I'm against paying for search because I don't want my search history to be directly tied to my real name via my payment method. I don't care what their privacy policy says.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 16 points 11 hours ago

The future of search engines is in the settings. Allowing you to control how you search is the only weapon against the direction Google imagine we all should find stuff online.

Kagi is the only search engine who has embraced this and they get my money for it.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 12 hours ago

Startpage is another alternative if you use more than the free searches Kagi gives you. I usually reserve my Kagi searches for when other engines like Startpage, Qwant, DDG, etc. have failed me.

[–] Bumrocky@lemmy.world 36 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This. Can't tell you the last time I used Google directly.

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

A few days ago when I was converting an old windows desktop to Linux I hit Google on accident (Firefox default).

On the first page I got 2 traditional search results. They were links to AI slop sites. The entire rest of the page was full of useless crap.

[–] refreeze@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Maybe its just me, but I find I get way more useless seo blog spam results using DuckDuckGo.

[–] vestigeofgreen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

DDG uses Bing's index. I assume Bing doesn't nerf AI in rankings as I get so many slop AI SEO sites that I don't get on an equivalent Google search. I used DDG itself before like 2024, but now I reflexively add !g if I don't think !w will work.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Ddg used to give non bubble results, it was their thing. Now its sucks and is location based even when disabled. DDG went to the dogs years ago.

Qwant

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

DDG NoAI site seems to help.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 10 points 12 hours ago

Same. I've been using DDG as my default for years, but it's main strength for me is using !g to redo the search after not finding anything good the first time.

[–] bad1080@piefed.social 4 points 10 hours ago

true, the only thing i sometimes have to go back to google is for an image search

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cx40@piefed.ca 16 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I got this too a few weeks ago and couldn't find any information on how to convert the address back to normal. I guess it makes sense if most people don't get those results. My fix was to just use a different search engine.

fyi, I got it while I was logged in.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

Surprised nobody has mentioned Ecosia yet. Web searches there are responsible for planting 250,000,000 trees. I can’t think of a better justification for using a search engine.

[–] kazerniel@piefed.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I used Ecosia for a few months last year, but it really struggled with more niche topics and searches in Hungarian. Also it kept re-enabling the AI search every other day, no matter how many times I disabled it. So in the end I switched to noai.duckduckgo.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 14 points 9 hours ago

Just a heads up, Ecosia relies on you clicking on Microsoft and Google provided ads for its revenue.

From there FAQ:

Do we plant trees if we don’t click on ads?

Like other search engines, we make money when people click on the ads shown in our search results. [...]

How does Ecosia compare to other search engines?

[...] We provide industry standard search results together with our partners Google and Bing. [...]

[–] onionsinmypores@sh.itjust.works 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I just tried Ecosia again after a long while (I last tried it around sometime in early 2020/21) and it seems a lot nicer and better than before. I'll use it for a little bit then :$

[–] Seimhe@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Good on you for trying

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I love ecosia.

STOP USING GOOGLE PRODUCT A FFS THEY ARE SHIT.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They use Bing and google on the back end.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago

Sure, a lot of other search engines do. I believe ecosia is the one building their own index though.

Kagi ia my favorite. Finds what I actually need like its 08 again.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 12 hours ago

You’ve probably not seen it. It only happens when you’re logged out.

Heh, I haven't seen it because I don't use google.

load more comments
view more: next ›