Seimhe

Considering the vast amounts of knowledge it has at its disposal, I can only conclude that it’s not very smart at applying it. A person with a fraction of that knowledge will produce better results.

So it has more access to information, but the results are poor compared to a person.

According to Cybernews research team, the only route to a definitive answer is to invoke your GDPR rights if you're in the UK or EU.

ClarityCheck's privacy policy lists a privacy officer contact. Put these questions to them directly:

Do you hold, or have you held, any image of me in the faces or profiles stores?

Was any image of me within the set exposed between [DATE1] and [DATE2]?

What was the source of each image, and which user account submitted it?

Was an Article 34 notification to affected individuals considered, and on what basis was it decided against?

But how do I identify myself to these people, and is it safe to do so …

There’s a huge market for slop: junk food, slop entertainment, fast fashion. We’re a planet of slop lovers. AI slop will remain popular among many.

"A lot of men and their behaviors have ruined this product."

That's men acting as they intended using a product as intended. There is no plot twist here.

the point about showing skeptics this isn’t a hobby project is the real unlock here.

This is my conclusion too. These tools aren’t associated with meme distribution.

I’ve used Loops a lot, but not the analytics tool. When I say “analytics dashboard” to anyone who needs those tools, and I tell them there are over a million MAU they do perk up.

I don’t know what they do with that information, but they definitely get a first impression that ActivityPub (which is what I’m really promoting) is a serious and growing contender.

Yeah, it could be much better. The reason I think it’s worth posting is because Loops.video has a record of doing what they say to a decent standard, so it’s not just wishful thinking.

These are the kinds of tools that people use to justify the use of big tech (well, audience reach too). Hopefully this is a cause for optimism.

You know that leading with benign parts doesn't successfully hide the contradictions and unhinged parts later, right?

it’s got fuck all to do with me.

And therein lies your problem. You’ve taken something which seriously affects women at large, and reduced it down to something about yourself.

Empathy can be learned (it’s in us already, just needs unimpeded space). It’s a higher-order form of intelligence that helps us understand the connections between things that are not mechanical, but rather living: each other.

Sincerely, if you can’t see that the trends of behaviours like this in men outpace women significantly, you have a heavily skewed view of the realities here.

There are other phenomena too that uniquely affect men, such as violence towards a spouse when the man’s team loses a sports game.

There is no equivalent for women at that scale. We as men have to own these realities.