this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
472 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87685 readers
2743 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 4 hours ago
[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago

Poor baby Sony can't defend itself

[–] redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world 27 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Uh AI steals everyone's work. How it's legal I'll never know.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

because it was ruled to be a transformative work, like how someone making a video essay on a book/game/movie is (sometimes) not violating copyright.

[–] antimidas@sopuli.xyz 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If AI continues to be treated as transformative work, there should also be a valid case to kill licensing requirements for sampling music. After all, there you're literally using small clips of someone's music or similar to make undeniably new art.

[–] NuanceDemon@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

To be fair, that should have happened a long time ago. Copyright law hasn't been fit for purpose for a long time.

I saw this ruling and fully disagree.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So if I modify someone else's art and call it my own, the courts will respect this precedent and let me go?

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

if you have enough lawyers and the art ia substantially different (different inteded use) they might

[–] 7101334@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

You got downvoted but this is just true lol

(Fuck AI slop though)

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 hours ago

Bite each other's dicks off

[–] db2@lemmy.world 31 points 12 hours ago
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 88 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Let’s play the oligarch monopoly illegal antitrust violating merger game… CBS and Paramount is skydance which wants to merge Warner, all run by David Ellison, son of Larry Ellison, which is Oracle, which works with OpenAI, so it totally tracks they would want to sue Anthropic.

This strategy is super familiar. This is almost like how Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems, to obtain Java to sue Google over Android… Hmmmmmm

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz -3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This might be the first time I'm actually rooting for Anthropic. I mean I do use Claude mostly because it's cheap as hell on a subscription and Kimi has pretty nasty terms of use... But I don't LIKE the company. But if it's them vs the Zionellison family, they better win.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago

I wish them both a very successful lawsuit, that bankrupts their opponent.

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Dunno, it has been fair use all along, why all of a sudden? (sarcasm)

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 112 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Fucking finally! Now let them fight.

Fucking crazy thing is that there have always been big ass people in the same room watching their shit get stolen. Warner, Disney, etc...

I can't imagine the legal pain if all of the media entities stopped paying ball.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

the oligarchs will settle between themselves on a way to fuck us over that's ok for both of them, as always.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 83 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I refuse to hope for a world where copyright and AI are both destroyed in one lawsuit because it’s too beautiful to ever be real.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Kind of an either/or deal here. If AI loses, copyright wins (and it's David fucking Ellison, son of Oracle himself). If copyright loses, AI wins.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Yes, we do live in a boring, dumb, and ugly universe.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 24 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm concerned how AI often leads to people to defend copyright. I fear it will come out of the fight stronger than ever, while not slowing AI in any meaningful way.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The result is going to be some kind of deal where AI use requires to pay a certain percentage or something like $0.01 per token in copyright fees. This will be the end of open weight models you're allowed to run locally on your PC. It'll be "piracy".

It will strengthen the AI corporations by allowing complete monopolization of AI.

[–] Wranglyph@piefed.world 13 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I'm not defending copyright- I just think that everyone should play by the same rules.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 6 points 9 hours ago

I agree, the big corporations, their CEOs, their shareholders, and their employees should follow in the exact same footsteps as Aaron Swartz. All of them.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

You and me both Boomer Doomer.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Just latching ointo the top comment: this page compares AI-generated music with the originals it blatantly stole from. It's against Suno, not Anthropic, but it illustrates the overall issue pretty well.

Obligatory (for Germans): GEMA is not necessarily the good guy here. Neither are Sony and Warner.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 38 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

And now watch everyone cheer for Sony and Warner to succeed in their lawsuits to extend the grip of copyright. What a timeline.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 hours ago

Wonder if Larry Ellison being a direct line between the US presidency and Israeli intelligence would change anything about people's opinion on Warner winning... Probably not.

[–] username_1@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, people are not THAT stupid.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

A while back I saw a thread in a piracy community that was cheering some other lawsuit against an AI company for similar reasons, so I wouldn't bet. The anti-AI sentiment is quite strong in these parts.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 21 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

They’re not going to walk back copyright law so I’ll take these rapacious AI companies being held a little closer to the same standard that we are.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They’re not going to walk back copyright law

Why not? These laws exist the make the rich more money; if the interests of the rich people trying to make money change it's very possible for the law to change to match that.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 13 points 19 hours ago

Because there’s more money to be made in keeping it than walking it back. I could see them making some kind of shitty carve out for the AI companies that they have to pay into I guess but nothing that would benefit the average person.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

We are talking about "Property" - the core foundation of Capitalism. The holy grail of exploitation. Everything in this manufactured belief-system must have an owner and a price, and that price can only be forced upon others with 'property-rights' + top-down force (acab's).

So, just about everything in our sick western fascist/oligarch societies is centered around 'Property' and the ideological right and moral duty to maximise profits from that property -> extortion.

The balance might shift slightly/temporarily if a huge cnt are fighting other huge cnt's, but will NOT go away as long as Capitalism is the sole driver of western societies. Maximum property-rights are the steaming turd every Capitalist cnt are eating/craving.

More infighting is imho better as it slows down this pscho ideology..

[–] ricdeh@lemmy.world -4 points 18 hours ago

You lost all reasonable people at "acab's". No one will ever meaningfully rally behind your movement as long as you spread braindead takes like these. It's poisonous for the left to be affiliated with you.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io -4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This isn't a question of "walking it back", though. There was never anything in copyright law that prohibited analyzing a copyrighted work before. This is an attempt to extend it.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Meta literally torrented 82TB of pirated material off anna’s archive and similar sources they’re not just “analyzing” things they paid for. Not to mention the various terms of use stating that content can’t be used to train off of that they violate as they scrape the whole web.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I love intellectual property theft.

[–] sixdripb@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Mind to explain why? Are you implying everything should be CC0? Are you saying what AI companies are doing is good? Should one license their software as CC0 instead of GPL? (sry, I’m not fully versed in the IP apparatus, so pls ignore my comment if I sound dumb. I will do some more research on it anyway at some point)

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

I think IP law shouldn't exist, because it assumes that ideas can be owned and leads to predictably absurd results.

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 7 points 20 hours ago

What about Suno and maybe others?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 4 points 21 hours ago

I miss groklaw. We'd all be feasting right about now.