this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
1176 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3768 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 73 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm still looking for a solution after https://keepandroidopen.org/

About 50% of my apps are from F-Droid (the others are specific local apps and especially bank apps, which is difficult ...)

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

yeah i need my banking, only thing stopping me from using a non-googled phone. everything else can fuck off

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tehsYs@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Will this affect graphene os?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

personally i think Moto G Power is gonna be a beast with GOS

Dual sim slots sd card headphone jack insane battery

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This will apply to 2027 flagship Motorola devices, starting with a regular non-folding device, according to GrapheneOS developers who hinted at it being the successor to the Signature.

Thank goodness it won't just be one foldable. I was worried for a bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 115 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

I love graphene, but I hope they're planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene's long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users' standards.

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 150 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Yeah by "switch to" they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that's a later phase.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 day ago

I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

They do. They say it in their roadmap:

Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it's currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago

I guess aosp needs more open source love what with Google treating it like a bastard step child

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Trampampoline@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 day ago

I'll believe it when the roms hit xda.

Excited, sure, just hesitant. No buy until it's truth.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 93 points 1 day ago (18 children)

They need to support it on the Moto G phones so people can actually afford them.

[–] ChanchoManco@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah the signature phones cost around $1.500 here in my country, my budget is $400 tops, no way I can afford that, my hopes are lost.

[–] pjusk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

iirc, as of right now, its only the expensive processors that meet the security standards GrapheneOS has. Therefore only being available in the future high-end Motorola phones.

[–] TeaWithDani@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup its exactly this. And with supply shortages, itll take a while to filter down in price unfortunately.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

it would take a while without shortages. with shortages, it will take a long while

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (7 children)

My question is, what support will there be for NFC contactless payment? The convenience of being able to not have to carry a wallet full of cards is one of the biggest things holding me back from fully embracing GrapheneOS.

[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 2 points 22 hours ago

NFC pay is not ubiquitous enough in my area so I use a phone case that has room for cards. I still need to carry a physical health insurance card and a physical ID as well so my wallet case is not going away. I actually bought a pixel 9 instead of 10 just because my favorite wallet case was available.

I'm considering just getting a Garmin watch that I keep disconnected from my phone to use for NFC pay. Seems like I would be able to set up my cards in Garmin Pay app and then just disconnect it.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay good, they clarified that they won’t ship with it. I’ve seen people saying they will but I never read anything from Graphene or Moto stating that.

[–] OpenPassageways@programming.dev 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Wouldn't it be better if it DID? Wouldn't that get around all the "tamper" detection stuff?

Right now I have Google Play disabled in my owner profile, but it would be nice if apps in secondary profiles could pass the full Play Integrity checks... even though I'm actively trying to transition away from them.

For example Cisco DUO says my device with GrapheneOS installed has been tampered with, and I was hoping that would go away if I could just buy the phone with GrapheneOS installed.

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

In the long term, yes it would be better if it shipped.

However, if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they'll choose?

Until Graphene's stock experience (i.e stock apps and launcher) mature enough to not look out of place next to google and apple, the average Joe will pick the more polished phone. I hope improving that is a task Motorola will be able to help with, while graphene keeps doing their thing.

Additionally with the app/play store dualopoly, Motorola would be shooting them selves in the foot if they didn't ship with the play store.

Getting an option beside a pixel for Grapheneos is pretty cool and a big step forward. I hope new demand will be high enough to show the decision makers that its an endeavor worth continuing.

It doesn't even need to be in the store, just let me order one online and check off a "GrapheneOS" box, the same way that I can order a Framework laptop with either Windows or Linux.

But I get your point, I can see how someone could get confused when their phone arrived and required some extra tinkering to get Google stuff to work.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Until Graphene's stock experience (i.e stock apps and launcher) mature enough to not look out of place next to google and apple

why, what's the problem with it? that it's not filled with promotional apps?

Additionally with the app/play store dualopoly, Motorola would be shooting them selves in the foot if they didn't ship with the play store.

they could just ask in the setup flow whether to install the play store

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago

if someone went to a phone store with a stock graphene on display and anything else next to it, which one do you think they'll choose?

People consider the phone features too. For example Huawei has built a really solid following due to their phones' quality and that following didn't go away when Google started sabotaging their phones. Eventually banking apps started releasing versions for Huawei AppGallery (the Huawei Android app store).

So the Google monopoly can be bent if there's sufficient demand.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

whistles

They make a $2,600 smartphone?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd bet that about half the price is just the RAM soldered onto the thing

[–] agit68@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

Can confirm recently got a box of 440 unsoldered Micron DDR5 memory ICs at work.

It was $140k. Not DIMMS but the chips soldered to the DIMM.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Man, I would be all over the is of it was on lower end models so I can run graphene as my sketchy international travel phone. But I don't really want to pay flagship prices for that. And I still believe in having a curated primary digital fingerprint.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

You could still buy a second hand pixel series a.

You could probably find something under 300€ with 5-6 years of updates left if you seek for a pixel 9a.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›