this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2026
779 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87550 readers
3149 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 80 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (4 children)

I love graphene, but I hope they're planning to also roll out some very strong stock software - or else this will make for a very rough first impression on a large audience of normies and hurt graphene's long run chance of success. The camera, gallery, and app store in particular will not come up to many users' standards.

[–] nieceandtows@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

I guess aosp needs more open source love what with Google treating it like a bastard step child

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

My impression from the article is that the Motorola phones ship with default Android, but flashing to GrapheneOS is officially supported. So it would only be people who would be flashing GrapheneOS anyway.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Yeah by "switch to" they probably do mean flash. I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones but maybe that's a later phase.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Would you trust a pre-flashed phone though?

I guess with GOS they have integrity checkers.

[–] late_pessimistic@slrpnk.net 10 points 14 hours ago

I could have sworn they had plans to ship Graphene phones

They do. They say it in their roadmap:

Hardware and firmware security are core parts of the project, but it's currently limited to research and submitting suggestions and bug reports upstream. In the long term, the project will need to move into the hardware space.

https://grapheneos.org/faq#roadmap

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There are some third party vendors online that ship pre-flashed GrapheneOS phones iirc, but I don't believe there has ever been on with it factory installed.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 45 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I would never trust a pre flashed Graphene phone. Always flash yourself for security.

[–] Filetternavn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 11 hours ago

I agree, you should always flash it yourself. Though GrapheneOS does have the Auditor app to attest the integrity of the operating system against another GrapheneOS device. It's always going to be best practice to do it yourself, however.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Motorola should be able to lead them into the right direction for this. Moto controls their own drivers and while i don't know, i don't expect they're using stock android camera, they can probably just provide the camera app to graphene

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There are some really talented people working on the camera systems for Apple and Google etc. what I don’t get is surely there are some equally talented engineers (in image processing) who love open source so why aren’t they working on an open source camera platform?

It seems an itch that’s not getting scratched.

[–] ernest314@lemmy.zip 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

idk if this is the case here but on a firmware level, interfacing with these camera chips almost always requires an NDA that they'll only sign with very large minimum orders

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago

This is also why open source wearables can't have the best PPG heart rate/SPO2 tracking.

There are only about 4 PPG analog front ends still in production that don't require an NDA and the Max86141 is the only one worth anything it seems.

You can't do analog front ends with any small FPGAs that I know of and it is simply to large to do it (well, at least) on a small wearable with discrete components.