this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
30 points (81.2% liked)

Technology

87515 readers
2820 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh come on all of AI is built on stolen tech, you can't get mad at China for playing by the same rules as everyone else.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago

I'm mad at China and at OpenAI, Anthropic, Facebook, Google, ...

Less mad, more statement of fact

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 3 weeks ago

I’m not mad?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Which is great. Intellectual property is innovation-stifling cancer. I'd certainly rather China have the tech to make all those EVs than leave the West to hoard it.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t necessarily disagree, but you’re a trashy person stop talking to me mrdown

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll never understand why people keep saying I'm Mrdown.

Edit: Oh it's not "people" it's just you. Still, why Mrdown in particular? Like what's the thought process here?

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Miller@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The problem with not doing the heavy lifting yourself and using derived technology and ideas is that in evolutionary terms you are not selecting for innovators. Down the road this approach becomes ingrained both philosophically and in reality as you let your own innovators wither on the vine.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah China's VERY good at reverse engineering stuff and playing catch up. Haven't really seen them take a clear lead in developing new technology in any field though.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's more due to the lack of new technology these days. AI aside most modern engineering is incremental improvements to existing technology—that's the innovation everyone is doing.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

GenAI? Self-driving cars? Robots? Materials science?

All science and innovation is incremental, but some have bigger impacts than others.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 3 weeks ago

In order:

GenAI?

I said "AI aside" for a reason.

Self-driving cars?

Fair enough, though I don't hear much about those these days.

Robots? Materials science?

No idea what's going on with materials science, but robots aren't exactly new, so this is incremental improvement to existing technology.