RIotingPacifist

US Sphere of influence includes Israel, not exactly great TBH.

It's fine when I do it, but introducing this as default in Spotify will reduce the value of ad-reads, and I'm guessing Spotify won't make up the difference to producers.

Sorry I meant this specific Lemmy community wasn't sure how to flag it like r/technology but for lemmy

YIMBOs in disarray.

https://github.com/KRTirtho/spotube let's you use playlists while listening for free without ads.

I dislike how disenting opinions get downvoted on Lemmy/technology probably more than even on reddit.

Everything you said is factually correct.

I disagree that it means they should be banned but they take money from corporations to produce slopaganda, that's just true, and even beyond that their videos are well animated but the moment they touch a subject you actually know about you realize they are just internet researched videos that go a little more in depth that reading the Wikipedia page but it doesn't seem they actually understand what they are talking about, which is fine except that's not what they present themselves as (same with CPG Greg)

I mostly use Nebula these days, but I've giving up on finding new content and I think all the creators I follow are on both because you're unlikely to get many new viewers on Nebula.

They're losing money, like cloud I doubt having OpenSource code would have much of an impact on the average consumer (maybe if they fully opened they weights it would have an impact but even then, they could delay the release a few months/versions and keep like 99% of the paid customers) being closed is more about stock valuation, they have to pretend to have a bunch of secret sauce/source that is worth infinity dollars.

Stream QR code seems like a very inefficient way to send data.

This seems interesting, far more real than any LLM bullshit, but I couldn't help but notice the demo video completely fails to capture blind spots.

Your known unknown are one of the most important parts of safe driving and speed regulation

Oh come on all of AI is built on stolen tech, you can't get mad at China for playing by the same rules as everyone else.

The meat of the article is behind the paywall.

My theory is that

1. China has better integration between academia and industry - I'm mostly basing this off how in the US the academia is chronically underinvested so that the private sector can get it's plunder of smart graduates, but when it comes to AI development you actually need academic knowledge of intelligence otherwise you're just approaching it like an engineering problem

2. US companies are incentivized to spend more, the more broke they are the smarter they seem, so there isn't really any incentive to improve in smart ways because you can just rack up a bigger bill with your investors and keep the circular economy going.

Would love to know what the recipe says though.