this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2026
292 points (94.8% liked)

memes

22494 readers
3117 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 86 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

It's not as bad as it sounds. PET plastic has the same atoms as sugar, so it's matter of reorganising it.

The researchers engineered an yeast that eats plastic and "ferments" it into sugar

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Mmm, the terephthalate adds extra crunch

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not as bad as it sounds.

Still, a new dystopian scifi trope is born. Can't wait to see it in action: "ingredients: 50% PET bottle sugar, 40% insect protein, <10% human excrement, flavor, coloring"

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 1 points 4 hours ago

By the way the article and researchers describe it this is going to target rich people that want to feel they are doing something for the environment, while keeping all their habits (kind of like lab grown meat).

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 46 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

NileRed on YouTube has done a few interesting things like turning plastic gloves into hot sauce through different chemical processes.

It's more of a fun science demonstration than anything meant to be even remotely practical to create food from waste, and there are some pretty nasty chemicals involved in some of them that really have no business being anywhere near food

But it does I think drive home the point that everything is basically made out of the same stuff and it's a matter of figuring out how to break it down and put it back together in the right way to be useful.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 hours ago

People really need to stop writing about the torment nexus because all it's doing is giving the oligarchs more ideas...

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

But it does I think drive home the point that everything is basically made out of the same stuff and it’s a matter of figuring out how to break it down and put it back together in the right way to be useful.

One step closer to my favorite utopia, Gay Space Communism* (replicators).

* coined by rightwing chuds, but I really like this term.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 22 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

The alchemists were right, they just focused on the wrong area of the periodic table. We can't turn lead into gold, but we can turn plastic into mouthwatering hamburgers!

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You can turn lead into gold; it was something that was demonstrated in my HS science class. It's just that the chemical used to make the change is far more valuable than the gold you get out of the process.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

We've so far turned lead into gold 2 times

It's just so expensive it's not worth doing except to see if you can

It's also weirdly easiest to turn things much more radioactive but further away into gold, such as Osmium, but the gold that it produces is radioactive

[–] veryblandusername@fedinsfw.app 3 points 7 hours ago

We actually can turn lead into gold and fairly easily now, it's just that it would cost you billions of dollars to make pennies worth of gold.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 19 points 12 hours ago (3 children)
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 13 points 11 hours ago

It's an old family recipe.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 12 points 12 hours ago

I thought we were having plastic bottles

[–] decolo@piefed.social 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago

Actually we can turn lead into gold by shooting it with particle accelerators. It is not profitable though.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 5 points 12 hours ago

The researchers on this one are convinced they can eat the cookies. And while scientists underestimating personal risks isn't unheard of (hence why they need university approval), it means there isn't anything obviously dangerous with this process.

[–] prenatal_confusion@feddit.org 15 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

For the last 16 years there has been some kind of organism that could break down plastic. Never seems to go anywhere.

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 1 points 3 hours ago

The ones I remember reading about all come with a big caveat: The organisms can only work after the waste has been through some capital and energy intensive pre-treatment, like thermal depolymerization, which makes the economics unworkable for recycling.

Maybe one day we can do the heat treatment with direct solar energy.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

This kind of thing always have a long trail of "almosts" before a breakthrough makes it viable outside of the lab. Every attempt makes us closer to it.

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

I once saw a comment saying that a bacteria that consumes plastic could be apocalyptic if it got out of the lab and spread everywhere

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, aren't most of these "scientists find microbe that eats plastic" stories just them finding something in the wild that already has such an adaptation, rather than engineering something new? The idea that a plastic eating organism makes plastic nonviable to use anymore is a bit like saying that we can't make stuff out of wood, paper, natural fibers like cotton or wool, etc, because those things will degrade given the right circumstances and time.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 hours ago

Nah some are engineered too, as a possible way to recycle none-recyclables

The issue is usually they are woefully inefficient

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 1 points 5 hours ago

Not really apocalyptic per-se. The nightmare scenario would be that plastic would start bio-degrading similar to wood products and become far less viable as a material for long-term use containers. Yeah, it would require a massive shift in how we store things, esp. highly reactive chemicals, but it'd hardly be apocalyptic.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The apocalypse of trash turning into cookies.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Cookie Clicker was right!

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago

Not particularly, it really would only affect capitalist pigdogs, everyone else would be fine