I assume you can with LineageOS and GrapheneOS
hirihit640
AI is really fast at searching forums though, can usually dig up posts better than I can. Doesn't help that AI slop has filled the internet making manual search harder
Something I should point out just in case is that 50% success rate is the same as random chance. So when the study says:
AIs were classified as AI 56% of the time.
That really means that humans could not tell the difference between AI and human, since their success rate was almost the same as random chance.
6 language specific tasks. They were programmed and set up specifically to perform whatever specific one task they had to do at the time, that is what computers do.
Sure, and that task was "imitate humans", and these computers seem remarkably good at it. That's what I'm saying. I don't care that these AI work differently than humans. They can imitate humans so well that humans can't tell the difference.
I'm surprised the painting is so old, for some reason the woman's hairstyle looked fairly modern to me
Edit: nevermind I looked at a higher res image. I was confusing parts of her veil as hair bangs
You overestimate most people. Here's a study from 2025
https://arxiv.org/html/2211.13087
Among AI models, Blenderbot stood out: in AI-AI conversations, it was judged human 67% of the times - more often than actual human-human conversations. In human-AI conversations, human participants were labeled as humans 68% of the time, and AIs were classified as AI 56% of the time.
Fair enough. When I say that AI might be sentient, I include systems like "LLM + agent harness", treating the whole system as AI.
That sounds like a lot of work to just read some docs. RAG doesn't require any training at all. I assume there are other approaches as well that would be faster than LoRA
Some humans think humans are so special. "Sentient" and "conscious".
Now I don't claim that computers are special, I think they are just as non-special as humans.
Sounds like you haven't tried modern AI yet. I could train an AI on your comment history and copy you, and nobody would be able to tell the difference
Aren't they using the legal system in this case? So it is by definition, within a set of established laws. Though to me it's not clear if the judge will let them actually get this data. If this were Apple, Apple would probably push back. Microsoft might just give it away for fun though.
My point was simply refuting the "no government" part of your statement. There are plenty of authoritarian governments that are just as bad on privacy
No government is requesting this and nothing can stop this massive transfer of personal information
Plenty of governments don't need to request it because they already have all this info. Like China.
How do you donate heat? Ventilation pipes?