If you want to argue then address the first three sentences rebutting your argument. If you want to express your feelings you address the personal. I gave you both options and you chose the latter. Consider me your free internet schizo therapist.
zbyte64
joined 2 years ago
That's a non-sequitur. A group of people banding together to protect themselves is not automarically an *archy. Nor does it follow they are secretly in control. I think you are describing your own personal reality then the reality at large. Do women really control your life so much that you feel you are not in control of your own life? Can you cite an example for us to analyze?
That's the nature of patriarchy. Women are to be protected while most men are disposable.
Would you say women and men are targeted in equal proportions or that one group is targeted over the other based on "perceived value"? Like I am not saying you are wrong, I am just saying, "yes, and"
I mean, why do you think they are targeting women in the first place?
We can simply build the tech then throw the billionaires out.
We did that with the fediverse but the billionaires still control the online conversation.
You’ll be able to interact with your agent through any device, including your glasses to keep you present in the moment with the people you care about.
The guy still thinks his pervert glasses is a product we want. There isn't a single original thought under that perm of his.
They do have billionaires, but they aren't calling the shots. Just ask Jack Ma
But what is intelligence?
-every idiot who can't tell the difference when they talk to a clanker
Putting aside assembly code gets compiled as well, the bottle neck is always validation of these systems. Making the systems more opaque makes the already difficult task of ensuring it works even harder.
More or less what happened to my former project manager.
view more: next ›
Thank you for explaining that to me and expressing how you feel.