So by your logic, fatherhood isn't real. Only motherhood is real.
queermunist
Do you not realize that an artificial womb still uses a fertilized human egg? Like, genetically, there's still two human parents.
It's not like someone is going to fuck a robot and get it pregnant.
A first edition has no value to me. The value comes from the words on the page, not the paper it's printed on. I could see value in a book that was hand transcribed or something, but the fact that it was the first book out of a printing press is worthless.
I should say being signed is important, but that's not really a rarity issue. That's now a unique historical artifact because it was interacted with by a specific person. That's basically the same as a bible having historical value because of who owned it.
It's not like we're printing books from old school printers where they had to assemble the letters by hand on a printing plate for each page, or they need scribes to hand transcribe books with a quill. It's all computer. There's no reason for any book to be rare.
The text is what makes it valuable though? I guess there's some value in, like, the actual literal physical copy too, but that has nothing to do with rarity. A bible can have historical value because of who owned it, but that'd be strange to describe as "rare" I think.
But the actual words in the book can be easily recorded and don't actually require printing.
I don't understand the concept of a "rare" book. Every book should be infinitely reproducible, the fact that they aren't is a crime.
When cities can't afford other things they usually cut them to save money.
I'm not sure Flock is the exception. Might be, though. The US is a shithole.
That's called content moderation.
to the point their government have to regulate the shit out of it
Sounds like the system works. A problem was caused by capitalist firms doing stupid capitalist bullshit, and so the government stepped in to regulate them. What a country! Imagine if our governments would step in to regulate stupid firms doing stupid shit.
There’s a reason you’ve been trained to knee-jerk hate AI, who benefits?
The fuck does this mean? We're being screamed at to love AI and use it for everything.
Why is a family deciding to use a robotic womb "unethical"? What's the difference between a robot surrogate and a human one?
You seem to be thinking they're just going to pop out babies into the orphan factory and raise them like spare parts.