queermunist

joined 3 years ago
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

A first edition has no value to me. The value comes from the words on the page, not the paper it's printed on. I could see value in a book that was hand transcribed or something, but the fact that it was the first book out of a printing press is worthless.

I should say being signed is important, but that's not really a rarity issue. That's now a unique historical artifact because it was interacted with by a specific person. That's basically the same as a bible having historical value because of who owned it.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 days ago

It's not like we're printing books from old school printers where they had to assemble the letters by hand on a printing plate for each page, or they need scribes to hand transcribe books with a quill. It's all computer. There's no reason for any book to be rare.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The text is what makes it valuable though? I guess there's some value in, like, the actual literal physical copy too, but that has nothing to do with rarity. A bible can have historical value because of who owned it, but that'd be strange to describe as "rare" I think.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

But the actual words in the book can be easily recorded and don't actually require printing.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I don't understand the concept of a "rare" book. Every book should be infinitely reproducible, the fact that they aren't is a crime.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

When cities can't afford other things they usually cut them to save money.

I'm not sure Flock is the exception. Might be, though. The US is a shithole.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's called content moderation.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 32 points 3 weeks ago (19 children)

to the point their government have to regulate the shit out of it

Sounds like the system works. A problem was caused by capitalist firms doing stupid capitalist bullshit, and so the government stepped in to regulate them. What a country! Imagine if our governments would step in to regulate stupid firms doing stupid shit.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago

There’s a reason you’ve been trained to knee-jerk hate AI, who benefits?

The fuck does this mean? We're being screamed at to love AI and use it for everything.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Glass is not a car. That's a few components on a car.

Yes, some processes can be fully automated. No, we can not fully automate the assembly of a whole car. It's still too complex.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lex is also a "12th level intellect" i.e. one of the smartest people in the universe.

Porky is a dumbass that thinks he can use a chatbot to replace his workforce.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

On the other hand, there's not much normal humans could do against Zoom. They need superheroes to beat him.

Not so for porky. He's just a guy.

view more: next ›