this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
76 points (82.2% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3561 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
76
Why your local LLM feels dumber than it is (forum.level1techs.com)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Something I should point out just in case is that 50% success rate is the same as random chance. So when the study says:

AIs were classified as AI 56% of the time.

That really means that humans could not tell the difference between AI and human, since their success rate was almost the same as random chance.

6 language specific tasks. They were programmed and set up specifically to perform whatever specific one task they had to do at the time, that is what computers do.

Sure, and that task was "imitate humans", and these computers seem remarkably good at it. That's what I'm saying. I don't care that these AI work differently than humans. They can imitate humans so well that humans can't tell the difference.