this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
318 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87575 readers
3769 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/70348978

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago) (1 children)

Okay, thinking on this more, I have a very hot take here.

What's the big deal?

Google is seemingly offering a locally processed machine vision API to other apps, as far as I tell. This might manifest as some messaging service nagging you if you try to send nudes to someone, or filtering porn out of a feed. Or other "safety" features I suppose, like classifying slur-laden messages as abusive.

...But Google was most certainly doing this with Google apps already. Like the stock photo library most apps use.

If people are already using unprivate services for this kind of thing, honestly, they were digging their own grave, and this hardly moves the needle. All it does is make the spying/censorship more apparent.

I say those users need a cold bucket of water to the face, and this may provide it.

...But otherwise, it wont affect apps that dont use the API, right?

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 17 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 13 minutes ago

Not gonna lie, this is a great meme...

I did say it was a hot take. I am not caffeinated yet.

[–] story@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

hey folks i got graphene, do i need to worry about this or is this what the sandbox is for?

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

just hoping my current phone survives ling ebough that my next one can be a linux phone

[–] roundabout@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Thankfully, I switched to Droidian at the start of this year. I am NOT looking back.

[–] imminent_nebula@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Never heard of Droidian, but I've been loooking into the status of Linux phones lately. Mind giving a run down of your experience with it?

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

What phone do you have

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Apple already uses machine vision for photo searching, that weird auto categorization it does and such. They have for years.

I would bet the photos app already classifies nudes, but silenty, mostly so it doesnt add your nudes to an auto album.

[–] sik0fewl@piefed.ca 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Aren’t viruses and spyware illegal?

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Technically it's neither. Viruses spread and spyware sends your data to an attacker. This app does neither. The third party feature however does make it easier for spyware to identify sensitive content on your phone, but then you have a problem anyway because you gave a spyware app access to all your media.

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 hours ago

I can see actual digital cameras are going to become popular again...

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

If you are rich and powerful, everything you do becomes legal. Because rich and powerful people are all trustworthy and would never do something for only their own interests.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 17 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

what the fuck? I had no idea about this. I never opted into this.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

No shit. The billionaires at the top worry about public safety, would you believe it? (giant fucking sarcasm tag goes here for all my asperger ftiends)

Who owns the (fully paid up) phone that's in my hands right now? I try to tell myself I do, but...

Yea, I am not a happy camper.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

If we weren't so fucking weak and unorganized, we'd be burning their companies and their homes to the fucking ground.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You can uninstall it and install this so that Google can't get it back on your system.

https://github.com/daboynb/Safetycore-placeholder

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Uninstall the existing app first

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Already did. Even rebooted to be safe.

[–] vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Open an issue on GH

[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 10 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

I once stumbled upon this app automatically installed on the phone I happen to have paid for (because at this point I doubt I could call this piece of metallic tile "my phone" and suing Google Inc. for them to refund me this phone would be as successful as if I tried to push and move a certain Mountain View building from its place with my own muscles). Shortly after that, it seems to have vanished from the list of apps as mysteriously as it initially appeared, either it uninstalled itself or it was changed names.

In any case, as soon as I realized that presence and realized I wouldn't have an "uninstall" option without turning on options that would straightforwardly break banking apps and government apps (gov.br the Brazilian app for everything citizen-related) I was compelled to use, I started filling the phone's gallery with all sorts of potentially-triggering stuff I either find online or (mainly) make myself: dark art including FNAF-like jump scares, haunted/cursed artifacts and occult/ritualistic imagery, photos and videos depicting snakes and scorpions, lots of Memento Mori including photos of cemeteries and tombstones, archaeological skeletons, buzzards eating animal carcasses in the wilderness, as well as media of my own cut wr... I mean, uhm, media of my own cute wrathful owl I sculpted on Blender. Yeah, several different 3d rendered scenes and short animation videos as well, especially scenes in which she's performing chases and huntings... Not to mention the plethora of owl photos and videos, many of which are birdwatching of them catching and eating prey on nature, in potentially gory settings (i.e. the unfiltered, untamed nature who doesn't care about our anthropocentric definitions of good and evil).

So if Google decides to start "protecting me from (my own) sensitive imagery", their clanker is essentially going to have a hard time having to go through gibibytes of media and potentially wiping the whole device as I made sure to fill the entire storage (even non-media things too, such as using provoking nicknames for fictional contacts like a contact card for "Inanna", as well as odd descriptions for bank transactions such as "my soul belongs to Ereshkigal") with purposefully sensitive content. If they do that, I'll then have something more concrete to sue them for: religious intolerance, as it's all representing of my left-hand path spirituality.

And with all this I leave this one absurdist idea on how to try and boycott the corporate nanny (and surveillance). A phone gallery full of sensitive items (not nudes, but dark/provocative art purposefully built to trigger similar nannying responses) will hopefully overwhelm their servers, shall they offload the computing to their data centers. If this doesn't overwhelm their servers, at least the techbros and their clankers are going to have an interesting time when scrolling through legal-yet-disturbing content they hoarded from Android users' phones.

!technology@lemmy.world

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago

Came for technology news, stayed for the Mesopotamian undergods.

[–] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not looking for stuff like you’re describing, skeletons, graves, birds, whatever spoopy “dark” stuff you put on there. It’s looking for nude people, then actioning/alerting if it thinks minors are in the images. You definitely don’t want to honeypot this ai bro.

[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's the thing: they're looking for something, and in order to look for something, they must look, and lots of computation (AI inference) must happen, especially when it involves nonindexed files (my own private art, from digital drawings and handmade sketches, going through photos of my own ritualistic installations, all the way to Blender 3D renders and animations, all of which is yet to be crawled). And if this involves gibibytes of data, on a smartphone whose hardware can barely run 1B parameter clankers locally without hiccuping, I can see my private files going to Google's servers for "efficient inference", files of which will likely end up seen by (and sowing some interesting inspirations for nightmares in the subconsciousnesses of) Google's employees during server maintenance/audits or, mainly, end up training their clanker.

As for the latter, hopefully Google Gemini would end up "seeing" enough of my digitized psyche to randomly start silly infodumpings about, for example, different owl taxonomies and their diets down to the very gory microdetails about how owls make a tasty dinner out of mice, and/or the different interpretations by historians and archaeologists regarding the figure (Ereshkigal or Lilith) depicted in the Burney Relief, a Mesopotamic plaque of which, by the way, is part of the phone's gallery too (including my own artistic works inspired on it) and seemingly an efficient trigger for nudity detection algorithms, which will likely put the rest of the gallery under automated scrutiny (because there was a positive, albeit a false one) and, thus, serving as the semantic Trojan Horse for my dark artistic private content to make its way to their servers.

I mean, how else Google Gemini would've taken the "inspiration" to suddenly start telling people to "eat rocks" and "add glue to pizza"? Its training data is crowdsourced so there's nothing much Google can do to avoid sources poisoning the well (and I must nod at the Nephentes algorithm which I praise as way more efficient than Anubis to hurt the western AI corps) other than:

  1. Adding said poisoned sources to their .gitignore equivalent if they know they'll likely find poison they don't want messing up with their expensive AI training.
  2. Doing manual curation of people's personal files, which is time-consuming and potentially unfeasible when dealing with billions of phones.
  3. Trying to improve the detection algorithms to avoid poisoned sources (which requires training data, which requires them to rely on potentially poisoned sources, which defeats the whole purpose of improving the algorithms in the first place).
  4. Stopping to put everything else into scrutiny when the detection algorithms stumble upon (potentially false) positives, risking false negatives, which will likely attract some heat from regulatory agencies worldwide and fines for failing to comply with things such as age checking laws (and there it goes the GOOG stocks, together with the entirety of NASDAQ, like a Titanic as investors realize they're paying for fines not theirs; be it GOOG or other stock, the popping of the ongoing AI bubble will inevitably be something in this regard, Western corporations having their clankers failing on them).

At best, this will consume some portion of Google's resources (including but not limited to human resources), albeit as infinitesimal as my silly existence can get to a worldwide corporation, but it's still something I guess...

!technology@lemmy.world

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 1 points 9 hours ago

Image classification is old tech that existed long before ChatGPT and similar huge models became the new norm. These models are already embedded in many data flows and run within milliseconds on non-specialized hardware.

You were talking about 1B models. More modern image classification are in the mere millions. Yolo v10 has like 7M, MobileNet, which Google often uses, has around 4M parameters depending on the version. Image classification is not why there are data centers being built everywhere.

Camera apps, image and video filters and content moderation (the app in question) all use them for live processing. I can guarantee you this runs flawlessly on your phone unless it's older than 10 years.

You're employing AI guerilla warfare against pre-LLM technology. It's not effective.

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So...

  1. They really don't care about that stuff
  2. They are using your own phone's processing power to scan, not theirs. I'm sure they have a phone-home mechanism, but they have no vested interest in scanning server-side when they can do it phone-side.
[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

As I said to borari, when stuff involves lots (GiBs) of nonindexed files (my private art) and a smartphone whose hardware can barely make a distilled Llama/Gemma to spit out a "The sum of the squares of the sides is the square of the hypotenuse" (yes, I did try local LLMs so I'm aware of my hardware limits), they would have no choice other than phone home, and thus carrying haunting voices through the ongoing call.

Also, they have some inner desire to hoard people's data for training their clanker. Except the data can (and will) be poisoned, thus poisoning the well.

!technology@lemmy.world

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

I appreciate the spirit of reistance, also +1 for the left hand path, however, the broader society needs a more solid solution to these privacy-invading and covertly installing apps. I get it you're doing the best you know how. I am in the same boat. But we need something more solid for the long term.

load more comments
view more: next ›