communist

The point is a complete and utter removal of social mobility

Do humans do better? By what objective metric? How many of these have humans even made in history?

Also you don't really need a human to verify these outputs, they just tried them. How many of these have humans even made? Also for the first of its kind with no previous rlhf scheme a 5% success rate is actually insane, this rate has historically dramatically improved with successive versions.

The stochastic parrot paper was nonsense, neurons are entirely stochastic. Stochastic models can be made very accurate

"Too stochastic" is nonsense. Neurons are stochastic. Also they made 16 from scratch.

In the near future an ai company will turn on their ASI and ask it what to do about climate change and it will say "first off shut me down, second off eat the rich" and only then will we know we did it

That's because people haven't moved not because the tech isn't good enough, just need the right instance and some advertising

If freebsd was copyleft PlayStation would've never used it in the first place. Same as the BSD TCP/IP stack with windows.

No you're just overestimating executives, Ai's were good enough for this job in the 90's

So? In many it can do a much better one: protein folding for example

Protein folding, then.

I did not claim they can tell truth from fiction, it's just irrelevant. Goalpost shift for no reason on their part, they don't have to be able to do that to classify things or predict protein folding.

I was responding to the claim that ai's can't do anything better than the thing that trained them. It's completely relevant and not a goalpost shift. They can do plenty of things that humans can't feasibly do, such as protein folding prediction.

Humans can, ai can do it better than humans in many areas though.