brsrklf

joined 3 years ago
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They've said they're working on an "infinite" slop mode where the conversations are AI-generated.

They used to have no AI disclosure, and people had to learn about them using AI through that disgruntled writer's story.

So now given the very mature CEO answer, I'm assuming they're butthurt that some people want to know about their AI use, and they're using the disclosure to claim that part of their game is not AI instead.

Also your comment made me briefly wonder why someone got Weird Al's comment on the subject, and it was a bit funny.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Your cat must have quite the appetite to hunt and eat a whole roomba.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 8 points 1 week ago

Basically digital dropshipping.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

That would only work for their own slop though. Anthropic cannot recognize Google's watermark, only theirs.

I assumed the goal might be so they could check whether other models have been trained on their output. Like anthropic using that as a "proof" when they start whining again about Chinese "distillation attacks".

Of course, since they're the only ones able to check their watermark, it would be rather shit as evidence anyway. "We've run the numbers, and we know you can't, but trust us, this chatbot is totally copying ours!"

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 7 points 2 weeks ago

It's practically not of any use to end-users. It's a tool made by the AI company for themselves, to be able to claim a specific text was generated from their model.

Probability becomes a non-problem the longer the scanned text is.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 9 points 2 weeks ago

I was not sure how any of this worked, and those interactive demos along with the explanation are quite helpful.

Also a very important point made about this not being a generic AI detector at all, and only being available to the model creator.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 21 points 2 weeks ago

There was a time random people could become "ridiculously photogenic" or "good guy" with luck.

Sorry dude, you're "pervert glasses".

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I am relatively tech literate and I have troubles remembering every canal I have to use to join all of my contacts. I have like 6 or 7 different ones.

Meanwhile, my father can't remember one password to save his life, and my grandfather tries answering the phone on a TV remote. Good luck with that.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

AI moderating AI advertizing to AI talking to AI.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 4 points 3 weeks ago

There's an app, Petit Computer/SmileBasic, available on Nintendo consoles since the DSi and Wii (then had 3DS, wii U and switch version). It's a programming language that has a lot of features using the target console's input/output capabilities (touch screen, 3D, gyroscopes, etc).

On 3DS there was a feature to share files (code, image...) through the app's server, but some wanted to be able to share their stuff in other ways, so they didn't depend on the app server or so they could share locally with a PC for example.

Someone made a modem kind of program with it to transform the file into a sound sequence, emit it, receive it on another device through mic and retransform it to file. Max transfer rate 92 bytes per second with error checking.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He's working hard on destroying that one, don't worry. The quest experience has only gotten worse with every update.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 6 points 3 weeks ago

I was like "wait, weren't there people measuring the Earth-Moon distance with lasers?" so I had to check...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiments

At the Moon's surface, the beam is about 6.5 kilometers (4.0 mi) wide

Oh.

view more: ‹ prev next ›