Wispy2891

joined 3 years ago
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 46 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

13 billions for something that if disappeared overnight, it would be just a mildly inconvenience and replaced by a 1:1 competitor in less than a day?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Eh, otherwise the "ultradumb" facebook ranking algorithm totally doesn't know.

Onlyfons? Ok, it's rated appropriate for children, and pad the post with some porn ads that the algorithm totally "accidentally" missed

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Projects won't get signed unless they project a 10000% ROI

Remember that they paid 53 bil plus a huge loan that ea itself will have to pay, for something that has a 300 mil yearly profit

Basically ea FC (or what's the name now?) will become a gambling machine to hook some whales

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why, what news? What I need to be careful this time?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They don't care about email scraping (which would be illegal)

They simply want people to install the app because it exfiltrates a lot of tasty data to them.

An email might "only" contain ab invisible image to track views and unique links for tracking clicks, while if the user opens the app they way more data.

From the APK I see they can get stuff like

  • All the contacts of the user, all email addresses and phone numbers
  • GPS location
  • Camera and photos
  • Microphone
  • Your phone number, your device IMEI and your unique advertising id, for cross tracking you better around other sites
  • Send push notifications for FOMO promotions like "OMG it's the last one buy now before it gets sold out!!!"
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They're pretending that they're still in 2008 where a basic word or letter swap in the copy wouldn't trigger the blocklist.

Facebook 100% knows about those ads and is willing to be complicit in the scams for pure profit.

With the massive datacenters running their useless LLMs there's no way that they couldn't detect those ads.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

150k is for a single district, statewide they plan to waste millions on this

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

But can you imagine if the datacenters also hoarded all the solar panel production capacity through 2028?

Although we would benefit from the dirt cheap panels from the bankruptcy auctions, while almost nobody has use for hbm memory chips

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

51k€ for the ultra basic trim that doesn't even have air conditioning, 65k€ for the average. Never saw one in real life because if someone needs one for work would buy one of these for A THIRD of the price:

what we use for construction

And if someone needs a penises enhancement device would buy a Ford raptor

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Did they think what would happen if the gas price goes up and their profitability is completely dependent on that?

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wonder if they did this to appease the EU or just to have a way to prove in court that a specific competitor distilled their model using claude

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

If I don't like it and there's no way to tell them to never show me irrelevant shit, then, while not technically an ad, it's practically an ad

 

TL;DR: you now need to pay a $20/month "meta premium" subscription to use a 100% offline feature that runs on your own malware-ridden smartglasses.

If you don't subscribe, you can use the feature that is already included in the hardware that you already paid for 3 hours each month

The now-paywalled feature boosts the voice of the speaker in front of you, something that even low-end ANC earphones are doing now. 5 minutes of free usage per day is basically nothing.

view more: next ›