this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
361 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3859 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (47 children)

Hope our descendants enjoy paying for life long drugs to prevent a number of diseases (fingers crossed anyway)

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you’ve ever had someone close to you develop alzheimers, especially family where it was then more likely that you would develop it, you would have no problem paying for drugs to prevent it for life. It’s probably the cruelest thing that can happen to a person in life.

[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two of my grandparents had it, I’ll probably get it if I last that long

[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And would you take a tablet a day to prevent it? As someone in roughly the same situation as you, I’d do it in a heartbeat.

[–] DeadDigger@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Pretty much depends on the price. If it is over the counter painkiller pricing yes if it is hiv med pricing no

[–] manuremy@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago

Maybe, if the side-effects are close to nonexistent and I can afford it.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump killed over 80% of all Alzheimer's research, as well as cancer.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, if only Alzheimer's or cancer would kill him for a change.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, Alzheimer's won't kill the body, only the mind. And listening to the gibbering fuck talk, it's not out of the realm of possibility that we're watching it happen in real time. Which is cool and good.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 1 month ago

Alzheimer's will absolutely kill the body. Your brain deteriorates until you can't do things like swallow.

[–] leriotdelac@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Not sure there's much to kill there...

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a mouse model.

I have no idea what is going on at KC London, but they are running to the press with "cures" every month.

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10835503/

Safety testing on humans (P1) is complete. No efficacy measures in the study, but that's not out of the norm for P1.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Interesting. I had no idea genetic damage was linked to Alzheimer's disease. Thought it was chance/inherent genetics, a bit like cancer is.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Genetics barely explains 1% of Alzheimer. The problem with Alzheimer dementia, FTD, is that they are likely many causes with a common outcome.

Some AD is caused by diabetes. Some AD is caused by trisonomy 21, Down's syndrome. Some AD is caused by venous blood restriction.

In later life, the brain accumulates a lot of reactive oxygen species that old mitochondria can't handle, the result of that oxidation is elevated DNA damage. Some people have efficient DNA repair, some do not. Why? Efficient DNA repair can promote cancer.

In the broad picture of humans, those that avoid cancer are more likely to get AD, an vice versa.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago

You're using AD as synonymous with dementia. That's not correct.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

There are genetic forms of early onset Alzheimer's that run in families. The majority of the cases are not that though. I personally believe the typical cause is a combination of environment and viruses. A similar thing has been happening with bee populations where a chemical weakens their ability to deal with parasites and viruses.

The most recent thing I read is a connection between tires and Alzheimer's.

https://www.newsweek.com/common-tire-chemical-may-raise-alzheimers-risk-study-finds-12172062

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Someone reports a new cause of Alzheimers every week. There is a huge amount of junk science with Alzheimers. At one point, it was picking your nose.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Yes, in the past this has been true. Also, the chemical world is incredibly complex and we have trouble modeling single chemical interactions with the human body let alone multiple. As I mentioned we are seeing latent viruses as the cause of other neurological syndromes like Multiple Sclerosis (from mono) and Parkinson's (from pegavirus).

The truth is it may be several factors that are exacerbating the ability of these viruses to cause damage and we are still not able to put the pieces of the puzzle together. Part of this is grouping many different possible causes under a single syndrome like we see with genetic Alzheimer's and environmentally related/viral Alzheimer's.

I have had the displeasure of working with Alzheimer's for over a decade. It truly is a horrible disease that steals your loved ones away before you eyes.

load more comments
view more: next ›