this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
367 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3668 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] red_bull_of_juarez@lemmy.dbzer0.com 168 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Expected asshole behavior from Meta and zero sympathy to people who buy that trash.

[–] pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was about to type pretty much the exact same thing, but I figured it would already be here for me to upvote :)

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 1 month ago

androids like zuckerberg are unlikely to have emotions, or humanity.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 month ago

Enshitification of shit. They truly are meta.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 32 points 1 month ago

Nothing fills my heart with such joy as negative Meta headlines.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Personally i avoid visible branding, and at that point you can just go with whatever frame you like. Investing in high quality lenses is much better spent money in my experience, lightweight+deglared+extra thin lenses make a world of difference for comfortable wearing over longer time for me.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 month ago

Apparently when you get Ray Ban frames for prescription glasses, you can pay extra to have the Ray Ban logo engraved on them. So if you see someone with prescription glasses with the Ray Ban logo, you can lose a little more respect for them.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I used to like Ray Bans, too. Then Luxotica bought them and they've never got any on my money since. I buy exclusively from Costco because they only sell non-Luxotica brand glasses for significantly cheaper.

Prescription sunglasses look identical to aviators, at a fraction of the price.

[–] eighty@aussie.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

did not know Costco sold exclusively non-luxo glasses - interest piqued

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sam's does the same and you don't need a membership to use the eye center for either.

[–] mmmac@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would be great of Costco had their own brand of smart glasses

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Why? Smart glasses are stupid and no one should be buying them. They are a scam and another form of constant surveillance and recording. Only now with more accurate face recognition. All hail the future police state.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Might I suggest Persol?

Sadly, they are expensive, but they look good and have great quallity in my experience.

As for glasses, five years ago, I got my first Lindberg glasses, and I am never going back to other brands.

I am currently on my third pair of black Lindberg Aaron and my current sunnies are a pair of gunmetal Persol PO1027S with custom brown lenses.

I have all of my pervious Lindberg frames and will start reusing them next time, as for the Persol, I lost my earlier pair of an earlier model of Persol sunglasses, but I plan on getting new models or a new pair of the same model to have some spares or variation.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Cheers for the comprehensive recommendations, I’ll check them out!

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good headline. Didn't call them "owners". Because this doesn't happen to something you own.

Article's first sentence already fails though.

[–] Trebuchet@europe.pub 15 points 1 month ago

Good. Perverts.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

This bait-and-switch bullshit has gone way too far and I hope the few dozen socialists that get elected this fall really wreck this shit for the billionaires and force regulation.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago
[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These mofos watched the failure that was google glass and went for it anyway lol

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am kind of into the idea of having a little screen on the peripheral of my glasses for a heads up display as an interface with my phone. Or even as a full screen mirror for my phone to be able to browse lemmy or watch video while still keeping an eye on my surrounding. I really can't imagine why they decided they also needed to have it record everyone secretly.

[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 month ago

The google glass design was pretty cool, sans camera. Iirc people were modifying them I think? Wonder how hard it would be to remove the camera. Probably soldered directly to the board. You could always try to make your own with some form of transparent screen

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

Usually one would wait til their product take over the market before enshitifying it. For this one, they don't even have a feasible market. Who am I to judge tho.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Sucked in, dickheads!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 1 month ago

Oh you thought we'd only demand hundreds of bucks for this trash? naw, now you need to pay a subscription fee. Now pay up loser.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Nobody deserves it more

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Well that was fast

[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

GOOD!!!! FUCK THESE GLASSES

These should literally exclusively be an aid device for the visually impaired and nothing more.

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

I kinda think that's hilarious and how everyone that bought these go broke. Maybe at least someone will finally learn something then.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Like, basic vision? That would be funny

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

The BMW of tech. /s