this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
319 points (94.7% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anguo@piefed.ca 302 points 1 month ago (8 children)

To save you a click: A betting app.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have watched more than one friend flush his family/savings down the shitter on these apps.

I don't get gambling, worst I ever did was a few trips to Vegas and betting on the ponies that bot count on one hand.

[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I put two dollars into a poker machine once. I won $7.

Now I'm up by $5 so long as I never gamble again. Don't want to break my streak.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Some people are very susceptible to variable reward schemes and it causes addictive behavior, especially people high in impulsivity, sensation-seeking, or reward sensitivity.

[–] Gust@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Hey, its me. Some people. I spend so much time looking for games that let me get that gambling psychology fix without allowing me to actually bet anything of value on them. Ranked ladders in games are peak, because the rank is meaningless but my stupid brain thinks its worth something so it feels like real gambling to win or lose it

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That dude's really never had an original idea in his life, has he?

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 15 points 1 month ago

nope. even back in his Harvard days his original claim to fame was a hot or not clone. Facebook was built off the ideas of other people and myspace. even the original exclusivity of FB wasn't his idea. He's never produced a single original idea ever. So how did he become successful? He got lucky that a couple dudes went to him first as opposed to another developer to build their idea.

[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

His complete lack of imagination and vision are what gives me hope that he's totally going to shit the bed one terrible idea at a time.

[–] moobythegoldensock@infosec.pub 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

A betting app where you gamble video game points instead of money. So missing the entire reason betting apps exist.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Initially, but the article mentioned they aren’t ruling out real money in future. I think they likely want to get a broad user base first, then start offering the really exciting bets for small amounts of money, eventually leading to larger sums.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

well there will be points <-> usd exchange just like japanese casinos which are totally not gambling and just let you win toys - don't mind the "we buy toys" shop right next door. This strategy is as old as time itself. Once you have this layer you can do so much manipulation and obfuscation.

[–] inkblade@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

The year was 2015, and I predicted that facebook would include a betting feature into their stupid app, and my friends called me mad!

11 years later, who is mad now!? 😂😂😂

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

Meta Polymarket?

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Damn, that might actually turn a profit. 😢

Doing the Lord's work!

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago
[–] AvocadoCumToast@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

This guy raises cows and has fun figuring out ways to feed the cow to make the meat more richer.

I’d bet $20 that’s how he sees us. Just feeding us addictive apps to make us yummier for advertisers. No concern for our wellbeing.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wouldn't bet a dime that the sun would rise tomorrow on a gambling app run by a guy like him.

[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s hard to mess up. In fact, Trump had to run off at least a few gambling addicts to tank his casino. Modern software engineers would find it difficult to create such friction in a digital environment.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Two important facts. One, there is no such thing as idiot-proof. Two, anyone in charge did not get there by not being an idiot.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I dunno... have you heard Trump speak?

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sorry for the confusing double negative, Trump sounding that way is exactly my point

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would argue that some people in charge are very shrewd and get into positions of power. And some people are decent and become leaders (Zelenskyy and Obama as examples)

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

did not get there by not being an idiot

This applies to both of them too. They weren't elected for being smart, they both are smart but they leaned on charisma, speaking skills, and a sense of 'genuineness' to win their supporters' favour. I really meant it. People simply do not get elected for seeming smart, and if they are smart they won't try to sound smart while running for office in America.

I was fond of Obama when I was younger, but I look back with disdain on a lot of his track record. He sold people hope, and people look back on the time before Trump with understandably rosy glasses though, so I don't begrudge anyone liking him.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’d bet $20

Soon, you'd be able to!

[–] adhdsergio@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Oof! Also this joke is so...meta

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

Next he'll implement the 18+ image generation that Grok was doing and you're getting closer to metaverse blackjack and hookers.

[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I‘m with Ed Zitron - the AI hype and especially stuff like this just makes it so obvious that the tech bros are flat out of ideas.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 10 points 1 month ago

Yes but turns out they don't need ideas to siphon all the money into their pockets anymore. The entire system is designed for it now.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 31 points 1 month ago (12 children)

He's got entirely too much money, if he can blow it on this kind of bullshit. Same with all of them.

We need to take at least 50% from these Parasites, as a start, reserving the right to come back for more, at any time. Out of that, we give a bonus to all their workers, then put the rest in a fund to cover things like Medicare 4 All, UBI, free college, college loan and medical bill forgiveness, free day care, etc.

And when we need more, we'll be back. And if you continue to squander your ill-gotten profits, so you don't have to pay your societal obligations/reparations, well just take it away, and imprison the corporate leadership who insist on pursuing their Parasitic business practices.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

Nice clickbait. Too bad I got my info from the comments instead.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The world has no idea how much it wants the Torment Nexus and it's up to visionaries like Zuck to show us the light.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

That's okay. He's got mountains of cash to waste because he's selling billions of user data worth trillions.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And he can't be voted out. Zuck literally made himself king of his own little virtual empire.

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I self exiled myself from his empire 12+ years ago. His crown means nothing to me.

He can't keep that sinking ship afloat w/ bots alone. So if people keeping walking way it all ends.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iamthetot@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago

He'd be an emperor then, surely.

selflessly

Having seen him operate and read about his past, he does not know how to act selflessly, just as a cat does not know how to fly.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago

last refuge of the desperate, building a gambling app, or gambling themselves.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago

I feel like he doesn’t get away with calling it “arena”.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Androids don't have a sense of self yet. That's what the title means. Right?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, not clicking on that headline, sorry

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, the industry as a whole I'd say was stagnating before AI came along, Windows 11 was full of garbage and cramming ads and games into the start menu and that was released a year before ChatGPT3.5

load more comments
view more: next ›