this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
468 points (98.3% liked)

memes

22489 readers
2326 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 11 points 3 hours ago

Can’t have vaccines, or trans people, because it’s not natural. But we can pave over wetlands and strip mine mountains

[–] Dryad@lemmy.world 38 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Undeveloped = not yet pillaged and exploited for profit.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 5 points 2 hours ago

To the Capitalist, a forest only has value after it has been destroyed.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It could be former industrial or agricultural land.

[–] lauha@lemmy.world 19 points 4 hours ago

So unrestored nature.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, do NOT plant stuff you intend to eat in your yard without testing the soil first, people. The stuff we put on crops and that we dig out of the ground is shockingly toxic and persistent. Sunflowers are a great way to remediate the soil, although you may need multiple years of planting and disposal.

[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago

What if it's an empty residential lot fenced in, in a high cost of living city, where property prices keep increasing and these owners rather sit on the land because it will make them more money than developing it?

[–] Eq0@literature.cafe 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The root of why Europeans could claim the land in the Americas: it wasn’t developed, thus it wasn’t used, thus it wasn’t owned by anyone else. No matter all the hunter gatherers that were making a living out of the land. No matter even the earth works that could be found indicating use. There were no buildings, thus it was up for grabs.

[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

Tbf, putting buildings up signalling use didn't suddenly cause conquerors of any geographic to suddenly respect that the land was already in use. See: Roman Imperial Expansionism, Mongol Empire, numerous Chinese dynasties, the Aztecs, the Nazis, the British Empire, the East India Companies, the Zulu, Mali (well Mansa Musa basically destabilized gold wherever he went).

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 8 points 4 hours ago

Some of us pay good money to keep it that way

https://www.openspaceinstitute.org/

[–] rotkehle@feddit.org 10 points 4 hours ago

I find the English term developed pretty weird in that regard. in German we use the word "bebaut" which literally means you slap a building on a patch of land.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Uncivilized land.

It needs civility.

[–] arotrios@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago

I've yet to visit a city more civil than a forest.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 4 points 4 hours ago

Don't tell me to be civil you jerk. /s

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 hours ago

Where meme?

It’s unrealised profit.

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 3 points 4 hours ago
  • temporarily nature