bedwyr

joined 5 months ago
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

You think that because you have a defective logic. I comminicated what I was told, I did not endorse it as triue.

You will never achieve literary greatness with your logic here pal.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I was trying to verify where this was, the guardian and reuters in like 2024 or so left me with the impression it was passed, but a cursory search after your inquiry did not find the detail. I had to leave town here, Hopefully I can find out tomorrow morning.

It sounded like they made the new rule but it's not in force yet from my cursory search that led me to some lackluster guardian article.

Quick edit, the news did say it was passed I am sure. I have been wrong before though on stuff like this.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Yeah that is good advice, hedge the bad times coming. I haven't patronized these betting sites because the one I liked, predictit, run by a couple universities, one in new zealand, was outlawed by the US while they gave the franchise to for profit companies. I am salty on this.

It was outlawed a while back, can't remember if it was the prez' first term or Biden's. I think the latter actually, biden was a fucking cunt.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

It sucks he resigned an election he won because the courts decided to disfaithfully charge their duty. The now lionized by the dem establishment Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the deciding vote on giving the vote to the loser of the election by the way.

Fuck Al Gore. Voters decide elections, not courts, he should have stood up and taken it, but our dem leaders, especially for president, are chosen because they are weak kneed sell outs. Biden was just the progression where every cycle it gets worse respective of party.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No problems will be solved in our favour. Us being those that aren't the oligarchy and their well to do tools.

I'm surprised to hear someone on .ml defending llm's. I thought you guys knew which side you were on on this issue?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If a person reproduced copyrighted works and sold them, they could be sued under patent law. In the US, and in all of europe that I'm aware, at least in the west. In Japan, in South Korea, and a host of other countries.

Reciting a book is one thing, reproducing parts of it for commercial gain is another and is absolutely a violation of patent law. Just as a musician that takes a song and changes the lyrics and beat a bit and releases it would be sued.

Do you understand the difference?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago

This just means Bill will have to shell out a king's ransom to prez and his legal sharks to get the case dropped.

The firesale pardon price of a million dollars in 2020 I suspect has given way to a sliding scale, and in any case requires a lot moe than a million now.

That is an interesting article though thanks for sharing I didn't know about this kind of racketeering specifically.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 6 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I called this decline into insanity and fascism back in the mid 90s. Also nailed global warming in 2000 or so, and called the nsa's bullshit years before snowden to name a few.

I am only right on the bad predictions, my good predictions are a shitshow.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 2 days ago

That is it, momma cass.

So the ham sandwich was framed? Those bastards! I think I did hear that before but didn't retain the information well.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 33 points 2 days ago (13 children)

I just heard about a prosecutor that didn't get all of his indictments and then sent the jurors that voted against him home and replaced them. That and other stuff, they aren't even pretending to follow the rules, they think everything is more openly corrupt than it is yet.

But anyway, the courts threw out like 200 indictments because this prick prosecutor didn't think he had to follow the rules/didn't know or care what the rules were.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, first the Tories maybe 5-7 years back or so cancelled juries for crimes with less than 1 year imprisonment, then Starmer's labour party just upped it to all crimes less than 3 years.

In the late 19th century they also passed a law where if they thought jury tampering was going to happen they could just do it with a judge, idk how often they have used it though.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For once yes. Grand Juries at the time of the Constitution were a safeguard against arbitrary and unjust prosecutions. The rulers have since changed what a grand jury is to make it the opposite, a tool of the prosecutors.

Luckily the prosecutors for this administration are so arrogant and incompetent they haven't been able to maintain that facade of trustworthiness which the masses still afford to dickheads in suits with position.

Of course the judges are so bad it often doesn't matter, especially when it's in a shitholy jurisdiction, like those protesters at the Texas Ice that got kangarooed by their dipshit hanging judge down there under preposterous, blatantly unconstitutional charges, cancelling the 1st amendment.

view more: next ›