Because ‘judgement’ is an inherently grounded ability, something LLMs cannot exercise, fundamentally, only mimic or approximate with heuristics. Sorry but obvious is obvious.
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2026
91 points (96.9% liked)
Technology
87575 readers
3743 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This proves that they will replace everyone - their only "mistake" that the technology is not there YET.
If you still use meta products, you are part of the problem.
You’re saying I can help destroy Facebook by using it?
Yep. Not going to defeat the Nazis by giving them blowjobs.
That depends entirely on how much teeth you’re using.
Lmao, isn't that Zuckerberg's motto - Move fast, break things.
Move fast and break things
No, not like that!
Techbros didn't even invent that shit.
That and "disruption" was just going into an existing market, flooding it quickly with cheap prices, and the second you squeeze out competition jack up rates.
It's the same thing Walmart did.
With AI they offer it cheaper than humans because they're burning investor cash and not making money. Once a company fires staff, their next AI contract switches to per token price instead of monthly unlimited.
And then suddenly realizing the "rockstars" that kept their job because they were AI experts, were just sitting at their laptop 8 hours straight constantly prompting over and over again. After that they're paying more than they were before AI with a shittier product and completely unpredictable workflow completely reliant on AI usage.
Hopefully we're reaching the point even c-suite execs figure it out. Once they do it'll pop.
the only problem I see with that theory is that the employee count reduction might let them go below legal limits requiring more bullshit making it cheaper to pay more for Ai than the people it replaced because you have less regulatory nonsense.
70 percent increase of major incidents. Hmm..
Awwww they're just like us
AKA huge mistakes a human would never make.