this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
406 points (93.4% liked)

memes

22478 readers
3903 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Arch is different...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Except the last arch news post is a month ago about virtualbox. I've blindly run pacman -Syu for years without issue

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 22 points 6 days ago (5 children)

It's difficult to take people shitting on arch in here seriously. I'll take 1h per year fixing whatever broke over a whole weekend upgrading Debian.

Oh and god forbid you need to compile yourself a package and maybe a few of its dependencies from scratch because that 6 years old bug didn't make it through the freeze last release.

[–] vandsjov@feddit.dk 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Debian can take a week to upgrade? Apparently I’m yolo’ing it and just the upgrade. However I have just done one major update, so u might just be lucky

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Whole weekend upgrading debian? I am confused. That's not how debian works?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What happened with Arch?

Wait, let me update real quick and reboot, brb

[–] zitrone@europe.pub 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

the fact that they wrote "be right back" 5 hours ago and then never came back is telling

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Another 13h later, still nothing

[–] zitrone@europe.pub 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

almost 30h now, the arch update has to have bricked their hardware or something O.o

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

Maybe bricked the user too

[–] BetterDev@programming.dev 6 points 5 days ago

Every hero has a journey.

Yours has just begun.

I warn you, this is not the easy path.

But I urge you to heed the call.

For though there will be trials and tribulations,

soon, my friend, you will own new socks.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why, what news? What I need to be careful this time?

[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nothing. OP is imagining an idiot for imaginary internet points.

[–] Sivecano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

This hasn't been a thing in years at this point

[–] katharta@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Idk, I've had installs of Kinoite, Bazzite, and NixOS bork themselves unrecoverably. Arch, if something goofs, more often than not I can work my way back to a working system without wiping.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah i had this happen with devices that originally came with Windows sometimes, mainly laptops. It must be a combo of BIOS, firmware and hardware that increases the chances of update instability. Its just not feasible for every distro to have the same kind of hardware config testing support that Microsoft has for Windows.

Windows spying on you is not just for marketing, they grab your current environment and sanitize the result so they can get a nice list of hardware and application configurations for when they need to test.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 5 points 6 days ago (9 children)

Why would anyone want to use a distro that can break at any update unexpectedly or have to read articles first to see if it's safe is beyond me.

It's too much of a hassle.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

yeah windows do be like that

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I've yet to have one of my windows systems brick itself. Several of my Linux systems have.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Same, at-least everything past Windows Vista era of operating systems. I guess Microsoft has the resources to test and deploy to most types of hardware configurations so the chances of getting a borked update is rarer compared to other OS's like Arch and Mint which have a smaller user base but more diverse hardware configurations.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Any distro can break at any update. If you've ever done a major upgrade on any fixed-release distro, you have very likely experienced some sort of issue.

And the solution is very simple (and the same for all distros): Enable Snapshots, roll back if important stuff breaks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

That's literally every distro ever. Fuck even debian can break on an update. Things happen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I wish arch didn't have that reputation because I seldom have issues with it

Its like that subway meme where it goes "my brother in Christ you made the sandwich"

If arch breaks it's 99% of the time user error, and that's ok. But to say it's the distros fault is incorrect imo.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›