this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
111 points (73.8% liked)

memes

22436 readers
2812 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org -4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

i'm literally reading the expression on her face. what does that expression say to you? does this look like an active, engaged participant in… well, anything?

having women look dumb in photo shoots is as old as photo shoots, and it's done to reinforce misogyny. this photo isn't an accident, it was done with a team of people trying to achieve a look. she's playing her part, and she's good at it. i bet she practiced a lot.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

she’s purposely putting on a vapid face in order to attract chuds

My guy, that needs some unpacking. I'm sorry, you can rationalize it however you like, thats kinda ick. And again, that doesnt make you a bad person, but its worth interrogating why we're constructing a whole narrative about her character and who she fucks based on the pouty stare she did for her photoshoot

[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org -5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you've already said all of this. are you ok?

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yep. When people ignore the point you're making and just keep saying more words that don't engage with your critique its generally helpful to return to what your point is.

And you're still not engaging with my point, and instead just deflecting by joking that I must not be okay because I'm reiterating that its weird and gross to say

she’s purposely putting on a vapid face in order to attract chuds

Still weird. Still not changed by rationalizing it as being purely about her expression. None of:

she’s purposely putting on a vapid face in order to attract chuds

is actually in the photo, or can even be expressed by a single contextless expression-- you made that up. And when I point out that thats weird you are choosing to engage with anything other than the critique I'm making.

But critique remains the same.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For me it's knowing she's MAGA that makes it enough for me to know she doesn't have too much between the ears.

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you recognize who that is? Cause I don't, and tbh I don't think the person I'm replying to did either 😅

If she's MAGA I think it makes way more sense to critisize her for her actual political ideology, but I have no idea who this image is of

[–] victorz@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sydney Sweeney, very famous ~~titties~~ actress.

She did a pretty good job in Immaculate (2024), though.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Slightly famous actress and mostly because of the political garbage.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

She's quite famous, but maybe not to you. I'd say mostly because of the tiddays but whatever you said. 👌

[–] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If you get that expression all the time from women, I have some bad news for you.

[–] bjc@scribe.disroot.org -1 points 2 weeks ago

sometimes i really question people's reading comprehension