this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
414 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

87598 readers
3967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 135 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (43 children)

given that advertisements and interruptions appear frequently during streamed content, including those inserted by the creator.

Nah, this is dumb as fuck. No reasonable person reading the ToS would assume the creators themselves are restricted from inserting sponsored segments and that YouTube is somehow liable for removing them. Where would this even end? Would GamersNexus quickly advertising their t-shirts count?

Seems likely to fail unless YouTube themselves are failing not to insert ads on Premium.

—A religious SponsorBlock user


Edit: So looking at the ToS, if we scroll down to section 7, we see the word "features" hyperlinked to. This page then reads:

With YouTube Premium, you can watch millions of videos without interruptions by ads before and during a video. You will also not see third-party banner ads and search ads.

You may still see branding or promotions embedded in the content by the creator, as well as promotional links, shelves and features in and around the content that are added or enabled by the creator. These links, shelves and features could be for their website, merchandise, membership to their channel, event tickets, or other related destinations that they are promoting. Ads or promotions may also appear on Primetime Channels, during live events streamed on YouTube, such as sporting events.

So unless they just changed it in response to this lawsuit, it categorically addresses it even though a reasonable person would likely understand without this disclaimer.


Edit 2: Just to make sure this wasn't changed in resoonse to the suit. Lawsuit was filed July 14, 2026. This was the ToS page on December 30, 2025, which still includes the link to "Features". Looking at an archive captured Christmas 2025, the features page still states:

You may still see branding or promotions embedded in the content by the creator, as well as promotional links, shelves and features in and around the content that are added or enabled by the creator. These links, shelves and features could be for their website, merchandise, membership to their channel, event tickets, or other related destinations that they are promoting. Ads or promotions may also appear during live events streamed on YouTube, such as sporting events.


Frivolous-ass, lying-ass lawsuit.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago (26 children)

You can't advertise one thing and then just add "nah j/k" in the ToS and think you're off the hook

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Youtube Premium has YouTube remove the ads that they have control over. YouTube only has control of the ads that they add to the uploaded video, on either end or mid-rolls. They do not have control of the video content itself which is where creators add their own sponsorship stuff.

We really want YouTube to have unilateral control to determine what is and isn't an ad, and to remove sponsored advertising that they are not a part of in uploaded content? Something that would also clearly be a conflict of interest as they are an advertising partner.

[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Forcing them to label adsegements and autoskipping them is possible and protects consumers from shadow ads that are increasingly more common nowadays.

Still that is not what I expect from YouTube premium.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Technically the "often skipped" section is the sponsored content.
But I suspect this is fed through user behaviour and not content detection

[–] Akrenion@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's also not mandatory labeling of ads. Which YouTube could force on their creating users and should for consumer protection.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

And they have tools available to mark the video as "sponsored"

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think anyone want youtube to remove the ads. They just want Youtube to advertise honestly. If it can't remove all ads, don't advertise completely ad-free videos.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If you go to YouTube to watch a commercial (here is an example for Orangina https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrkUDm9pnIw), should the whole video be blocked? YouTube provide a video hosting service and they add commercials on top of that.

I find it unreasonable to demand that YouTube essentially remove content from within the video. That would just end back in the EU "protect-the-children"-Chat Control area of the debate. You could have uploaders mark their videos as containing marketing (and perhaps they do) but enforcement would still be difficult given the sheer volume of videos.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I already wrote no one is demanding they remove all ads. But they can't describe premium as "removes all ads".

No one reasonable will demand I sell them the statue of liberty. I can't do that. But I am still not allowed to advertise that I have Statue of Liberty for sale. The issue isn't youtube not removing these ads. The issue is they claimed they would for premium.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I always understood "removes all ads" and removing all ads placed in their product by them. With this understanding, I think asking them to remove all ads would mean to in some way enforce uploaders to not have ads in their videos if you are showing them to a premium user.

But I can understand how someone else interprets "removes all ads" as delivering an experience free from all ads of any kind, including those placed in the video by uploaders.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, it is what it says on the label. Sure, you may have enough knowledge to understand it is impossible, but some people being able to spot a scam doesn't make it less of a scam. And it doesn't mean the people who don't know that much about how youtube works and get scammed should be unable to sue.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's called content moderation.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

YouTube also provides a pretty handy tool for getting past those. There's a DOT located right where the sponsored section of any YouTube video ends that you can fast forward right to.

load more comments (22 replies)
load more comments (38 replies)