this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
6 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87450 readers
3281 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

laughs in Firefox/Librewolf

[–] laz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 months ago

Corpo banned it for compatibility with crap code apparently

[–] iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No worries, play store-recaptcha is coming for you too!

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

affects mobile the most obviously... but google's playbook is to basically have forced telemetry always and enforce integrity of their telemetry, and by extension advertising etc.

https://piunikaweb.com/2026/05/07/google-recaptcha-play-services-requirement/ - this just seems like an ok article for it, I did a simple web search and it came up, but others certainly exist if you dislike the source.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Looking forward to when they remove the old options & force PC users to scan reCAPTCHA QRs:

“Scan to verify you’re human” screenshot

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Those sites will be dead to me :)

QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

I still won't actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

[–] lemongarlic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

How are people without phones expected to pass the captcha?

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

FF support is getting worse and worse though.

Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 2 months ago

Fun fact: many sites that say that they don't support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox "less secure" or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

(Not all sites ofc)

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wait, what sites don't work in firefox?

Yet to see one.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've answered this so many times.

Banks, my uni, accounting software I use at work.

Its a well acknowledged and much discussed fact that the web is buggy with ff.

[–] greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo 1 points 1 month ago

Wack. Its usually chrome that shits the bed. Or its because their app cant tolerate an adblocker.

Doesn't match up with my lived experience. Sorry for your loss.