this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
174 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

87627 readers
3868 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Brewchin@lemmy.world 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bigmclargehuge@lemmy.zip 22 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

My fear is that this will change. We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected. So in theory future devices like Roku and Apple TV could act as a proxy for the tv.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

We already saw LG load malware via windows when connected.

This was 100% a Windows driver issue as opposed to a TV issue. And I could see possibly Roku doing this, but not Apple. Apple being Unix based precludes the type of driver loading that Windows is susceptible to.

Same goes for Linux. Just use Linux.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

So in theory future devices like Roku

This is your reminder that the Roku company is currently in the process of being purchased by Fox News. No, I'm not joking.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

They could but why would they? Roku sells data on you already and has limited things to gain from teaming up on the off chance you’re using a second source for content. Apple sells on the basis of privacy for a higher price and if they’re getting into that game like Roku they’d just spy themselves and not help a competitor on the chance a consumer has blocked it.

If anything Roku and others being able to say “we have data on people TV makers don’t” increases their own value proposition.

The real risk IMO is on device analysis and built in cellular modems sending this data. That and things like Amazon sidewalk meaning your neighbor’s Alexa device passes it on for a fee. That and just refusing to work without internet of course.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 13 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I also fear we will have to install faraday mesh in our walls when these things start arriving with their own internet connection to collect your data and show you ads.

[–] boatswain@infosec.pub 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can only imagine how this would totally screw with cell signal and probably generic interference with wanted wireless tech.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

As someone who lives in an older style house that totally screws with cell reception “Wi-Fi Calling” makes all the difference