694
With the backlash to data centers, Flock and AI glasses, a mass opposition to big tech is underway. Silicon Valley is in denial.
(www.bloodinthemachine.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
It's because these products work. They actually provide value to the users, despite opponents' insistence to the contrary.
And here I've tried generative LLMs about once a year and every time I go "what the fuck are people smoking to think this is good".
I think everyone insisting all this stuff is providing value are legitimately idiots who haven't spent even a half second thinking for themselves or about the future or the quality of their work.
I wish I was more dumb and saw these products working like you insist and didn't have to spend half my time rejecting AI slop PRs that genuinely don't address anything.
That's the worst fucking part. You can't fix stupid, and they've just learned how to weaponize stupid.
The amount of effort it requires to create a useable work flow built around a genAI llm as the core instead of just a tool in the work flow is absurd.
It basically takes three times the effort to get good results out of it when compared to doing it the old fashion way.
And both require you to still actually understand art to actually produce good results. You can't just tell an ai to shit out a picture and have it be good. No more then you can tell an artist to just shit out a picture and have it be good.
Both require you to actually put effort in, go though the process and make mistakes fix them. Go back and forth and test ideas.
And that's the fundamental problem. GenAI is only good enough to at best do the equivalent of a rushed first draft with flat colors. It's "good enough" not actually good.
And the sort of people using genai arnt the sort of people who are going to go back and edit or clean up the picture. To test and try different things. Hell they aren't even going to be the sort that custom tunes their model to actually produce what they want.
They just take what ever generic shit model they can find and run with it.
The difference between a generic model and custom trained one is night and day after all. But again the fucking idiots using gen AI ain't gonna bother to do that let alone know how.
Prompt jockeys are the least qualified people to use genAI. It's comical.
"old fashion way." * old fashioned.
Let's say, for the sake of argument, that they do bring value. If all you need is a car, any car, would you buy a "used, in great condition, original owner selling" F-15 that comes with a subscription to use the flaps and work the landing gear?
Your comment is complete and utter bullshit.
Do the services work? Most of them do what is expected, yes. But to have them sqeezing me at every point, and looking as far up my ass as the camera will go to use something that works is just fucking moronic.
I mean, people like you insist on this, but I can't evaluate the truthfulness of that claim since I haven't used a Meta product since Facebook in like 2009 lol.
But sure man, glad the mega company is really working out for you!
Depends on the definition of "work". There's plenty of people I had on Facebook that I no longer talk to because I don't use Facebook. To be clear, my Facebook still exists. It's there to face tank all the family photos my MIL shares. That's the only reason the account still exists at all.
That's technically working for me.
But lots of people are just addicted and Facebook or insta or messenger scratches an itch for them.
They provide value for some, but so far most people use the free version and monetizing the thing by moving users to paid subscriptions fails miserably. Professional users also question the value compared to price hikes they're seeing.