this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
575 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3844 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BooBees@fedinsfw.app 71 points 14 hours ago (12 children)

Probably because he was with some of them trading Pokémon cards at the time, couldn’t have been him, everyone has a doppelgänger

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 18 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Come to think of it, how accurately can facial recognition tell apart to people who look very similar?

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Zero. Zero accurately. They don't even talk about it, because they don't care. The arbitrary cruelty is a bonus feature.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

I bet the manufacturers of these surveillance systems leave a wink wink way for authorities to slip a name in their systems as a hit for something too.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Facial recognition has an inherent bias as well, or at least it did not too long ago. It was mostly trained on white people, so it's accuracy with non whites was really bad. I'm sure the training data is far more robust now, but that doesn't necessarily mean better.

[–] ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Not at all, but that’s the court’s problem I guess.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au -3 points 10 hours ago

By recognizing faces. Obviously.

load more comments (6 replies)