this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2026
464 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

87417 readers
3890 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 17 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

Come to think of it, how accurately can facial recognition tell apart to people who look very similar?

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 25 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Zero. Zero accurately. They don't even talk about it, because they don't care. The arbitrary cruelty is a bonus feature.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

I bet the manufacturers of these surveillance systems leave a wink wink way for authorities to slip a name in their systems as a hit for something too.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago

Facial recognition has an inherent bias as well, or at least it did not too long ago. It was mostly trained on white people, so it's accuracy with non whites was really bad. I'm sure the training data is far more robust now, but that doesn't necessarily mean better.

[–] ToastedCoconuts@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Not at all, but that’s the court’s problem I guess.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au -2 points 4 hours ago

By recognizing faces. Obviously.