But that's the thing: now you haven't made an email replacement, you've made email more complicated.
If you're backwards compatible you need a very compelling feature to get people to switch, and using the feature is limited until people switch.
That's how we added spf, dkim, dmarc and starttls.
The biggest difficulty is managing the layers of compatibility.
Oh, there have been plenty. The issue though is the classic "make a better standard, and now you have N+1 standards".
Everything is wrong with SMTP. It's still in use because it's supported everywhere. Anything that wants to replace it either needs to entirely replace it in one fell swoop, or it needs to be backwards compatible.
The result is that occasionally a new thing comes up, a handful of people try it but there isn't critical mass to make other features really useful so it fades.
People in charge of the company I work for are actively delusional.
We had a four hour mandatory meeting to go over our product strategy. The high level vision. For the engineers. No rest breaks. It was announced there would be a test on the materials. Not as a joke.
The top question in the Qa section afterwards was "what is our product strategy?".
The meeting had roughly 10k attendees.
"AI agents are going to become so pervasive that we'll need to put a computer on every desk in every office. I'm serious: have you tried to buy a Mac mini lately? They're just not available". "Datacenters in space".
We think they were announcing a new product dashboard, but we're not sure.
A huge amount of freakout about how AI will make everything different and better that most people on the ground don't agree with, but we're mandated to reorganize stuff according to the theory of how it should work in their vision. Teams that change and shift every few weeks. No fixed goals in the week to week timescales. Less planning, more demos, and development goals dictated by higher ups AI agents.
When it all shits the bed they won't be the ones getting fired. They'll be the ones collecting the same paycheck and talking about how "limited restructuring" is hard for everyone, but market forces dictate.
I've never been under the impression that my work makes the world a better place. I've always sold a product that goes to companies that do stuff that might help someone else help people.
It's someone else having a goddamened coke bender on 50k people's livelihoods with no consequences that has me down.
I use one to two pea sized ... Servings? I'm not sure what you call a single brushing session worth of toothpaste. Serving feels wrong, and so does dose, portions or squeeze.
I use one to two pea sized dollops of toothpaste two to three times a day. I know I should use a bit less but I can't be bothered to not overshoot a little, and too little toothpaste feels like garbage.
Depending on what I eat for lunch and if I'm home I'll brush after lunch.
I'm willing to bet the biggest difference in duration of tubes is the brand. I know some of the specialty toothpaste tubes are literally a quarter the size of my standard issue toothpaste.
I won't disagree with what you said, but I'll disagree that it's the same point I was making.
My point was that there isn't a technical solution to traffic congestion. You need less fluid or a bigger pipe. What you correctly mention is why a bigger pipe won't work for humans when it does for water.
And out of pure pedantry, I'd disagree purely because my analogy said "non-newtownian liquid" - those don't expand. :P it's more like a hyperactive toddler manically jamming silly putty into a PVC pipe.
Traffic congestion doesn't happen because of lack of coordination. Coordination prevents collisions. Our success rate could be a lot better but the system does pretty well with coordination limited to blinking lights, a noise that says "fuck off", the mutual knowledge that we all got the same training and the private knowledge that everyone else on the road is a suicidal idiot who slept through the training.
Congestion is a physical property of the road network. There's a physical limit to the number of cars you can push through a road in a given time period. Drive the cars too fast and they fly off the road when it bends, or cars slam into each other when a deer tries to commit suicide.
Traffic is well modeled as an incompressible slightly non-newtownian fluid, like runny oobleck. If you apply more pressure/increase vehicle volume the fluid starts to bind up as it becomes harder for the cars to maneuver without collision, regardless of coordination.
You reduce traffic by taking cars off the road, or scheduling utilization. Self driving cars won't help, and we can do both of those without them. Long term they're likely to make collisions worse because humans don't know what they're going to do, so the primary mode we have of coordination, "the theory of mind" will break down. Right now they're so uncommon that you assume any car is a human who reacts and prioritizes like you.
Tear down the freeways and replace them with trains.
Almost certainly.
They don't have to, since it's not a part of the system that it requires them to hold onto the information, but they all invariably hold onto the information to keep training on it, which includes your personal information.
They are likely not using for selling to other people or anything since that's not their business model at the moment, but it's probably finding it's way into the next version in some capacity.
Most of the ones like that vent the heat primarily through an area that can be effectively cleaned and has significantly better airflow. So the back radiator is larger but it's effectively never cleaned and the air exchange volume is the gap between the back of the fridge and the wall.
Venting out the bottom allows exchange with the rest of the room, but does require more work to ensure the air actually flows. Additionally, you can clean the vent with a vacuum, and it's a lot more likely that will actually happen than someone pulls the fridge forward and wipes the coils with a damp but not wet cloth.
You think I'm archiving?
Friend, I'm wholly in this image, filled with shame, but honest enough to admit it.
The linked sites? Those aren't the subject of the meme, they're some of the suppliers for my uncontrolled addiction to reading the first paragraph of something, thinking I might want to reference it later and then hitting download and never, ever returning.
It does go in a folder which is never cleaned though, which remains entirely unorganized.
Parents are written in customary primarily, but the patent office recommends listing units in both for global clarity.
It wouldn't invalidate them because customary is defined by metric, so there's no ambiguity. It's exactly the same as saying "the bar is 1 meter long" vs "the bar is 100 centimeter long". An inch is just a quaint way to write 25.4 mm.
The argument is that since the numbers between 0 and 100 are sacred, as proponents of both metric and imperial temperature scales agree, that the system that centers that range more evenly over the range of temperatures experienced by humans is preferable, and wastes less numeric precision on common temperatures.
This is flawed because it turns out that 1) people can comfortably use a wide enough range of numbers that it doesn't matter and the value of the system you are used to far outweighs the saved handful of syllables and 2) people don't communicate about weather colloquially with enough precision or accuracy for any possible advantage to actually matter.
There are only two reasons to use one system over the other, and they're both consistency. Consistency with the rest of the world, and consistency with itself.
Everyone else uses metric, so we should too. It also uses a system, as opposed to a combination of every 14th century tradespersons system.
You'll have to walk me through what you mean by that. I'm not sure how what I'm hearing you say would improve anything.