One interesting finding relates to driving modes. While almost all new cars have them, just 27.3 percent of respondents say they regularly use their vehicle’s driving mode. Those aged 25 to 34 were more likely to use them, at 38.3 percent.
so what, all these people are always driving in reverse...??
The article is about Facebook glasses. The topic is Facebook. Differentiating between Facebook spy glasses and "smart glasses in general" isn't relevant here.
You sound like you're arguing in bad faith. That's a lot of the reason for why you're getting downvoted.
I've never wanted to punch a word in the face until the word "agentic" started popping up everywhere.
I refuse to even pronounce it correctly.
"ajanteek" is probably what I'd say if I was forced to utter such unspeakable trash
but I'd guess that some of the technologies that make SS travel possible may make subsonic travel more efficient.
I wouldn't count on that. if a plane is optimized for efficiency during the longest part of its flight, which would presumably be supersonic cruise at high altitude, a bunch of things that make modern airliners as efficient as they are (blended winglets, and turbofan engines where the fan generates more thrust than the actual turbine engine exhaust) are directly counter to that
It's an entirely different kind of flying. All together!
I’ve seen nothing that AI can do that justifies the economic or ecological cost.
this sentence is worthy of being on a bumper sticker. very well said!
Fix It Again, Tony
Problem is, even tho I don't subscribe, the data connection is still there, and it's still used to deliver some OTA updates, and a recall on the battery involves some remote monitoring that, so even tho I don't subscribe I still don't feel entirely safe from being surveilled.
I've thought a bunch about seeing if I can just pull a fuse and kill connectivity without killing anything else, but the battery recall thing is reason enough to avoid that for the time being. Besides, Flock (and other) surveillance cameras popping up everywhere are such a bigger problem anyways that it kinda kills my motivation to bother
I'm not saying I trust Porsche at ALL with my data. Far from it. In fact I at least trust Google to have better software engineering standards, even if their software is inherently surveillance evil bullshit.
But I haven't been able to confirm that Porsche actually DOES log and exfiltrate location or navigation data. Certainly not in my Lexis Nexus report, and there's been nothing I've seen reported about them when a bunch of other automakers have been called out for selling surveillance access.
What I do know is that Google is confirmed to be doing so. Unless I've missed some reporting or leak, I can't confirm that Porsche is collecting, exfiltrating from my car without an active data plan, and selling GPS and nav routing data from it.
keeping the navigation database up to date is one. no way to update maps in my Taycan without paying $27 a month for Porsche Connect, which I have never paid.
and I dislike relying on Android Auto given the surveillance inherent in enabling it. it'd be nice to not have fucking subscription navigation maintenance
my lemmy client doesn't support opening arbitrary web pages
which is my entire point: your proposal is dead in the water as it doesn't work universally.
Summit Android app.
I can't back up my own driveway with "maneuvering assist" enabled or it slams on the brakes every time it gets close to a completely harmless fern on the passenger side. Every time it happens it's so infuriating that I could actually scream. So it's now off.