nobodysreadingthis

joined 5 days ago
[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Succks he made a movie instead of non-insane environmental policy.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 1 points 4 days ago

without subsidies

They already get those. Money is whatever, climate is a bigger deal.

And it seems like they already need to move a lot of freight. You're really attached to that airport. Have you tried telling it about your feelings? Might be willing to fuckyou. You never know til you ask.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I couldn't tell what he was trying to lie about, just that he was lying about something.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 1 points 5 days ago

Just as soon as we get those carbon capture factories working!

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 2 points 5 days ago

No, dude, I said you were right. Like THE mountains, just entirely in THE mountains. Or the mountainy islands? Doing trains there is silly and stupid And impractical. Just doesn't make sense some places.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 8 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I hadn't registered it as a performance of caring.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 10 points 5 days ago

Genuinely hadn't noticed.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Switzerland and Japan too. Some places trains just can't work. You got a point I guess.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 1 points 5 days ago

Not limiting this statement to airlines.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 2 points 5 days ago

Its just normal curry but you feed it to people who had to sleep outside.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I have been on Amtrak trains. They're fine. The drinks are bottom shelf and overpriced, the cocktails are a little basic, the seats don't all recline, but they're fine.

Another advantage: you can move agricultural products on train! Livestock, even! Sounds like a pretty good case for having trains, and Amtrak uses the same rail standards as freight, not that Amtrak is the only option for having a train.

Why do they have an airport but no train station? Train stations can be pretty minimal. They're not hard to build. Maybe they should get on that. Especially if they're so poor. Trains really seem like the way to go. This is a bizzaire state of affairs to defend.

I'm vegan and mostly eat fruit recently BTW. I probably don't eat anything from there, and I paid for it if I did. Those vile chuds did not compensate me for the ecological damage of their bizzaire transportation decisions.

[–] nobodysreadingthis@quokk.au 5 points 5 days ago

But then how will the apparatus of law work on you? That opinion seems like criminal behavior. You must have something to hide, or believe the apparatus of law would fabricate it, which is criminal behavior.

view more: ‹ prev next ›