merc

joined 3 years ago
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what public displays of affection have to do with anything.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You mean a secretary who lives at your house?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

By "self-hosted personal assistant" you mean LLM?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

That person doesn't need to leave WhatsApp completely right away. They can just talk to some people on Signal and others on WhatsApp.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What I want out of a Discord-a-like:

  • Screen sharing / game sharing
  • Voice chat
  • Text chat
  • Video chat (voice + camera)

Do your bots and plugins make that possible?

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

From that article:

Lilly doesn't know "how present my transness was in the background of my brain as we were writing" The Matrix.

They weren't consciously making it a trans allegory. And, the studio would never have accepted it if that was all it was. In retrospect it's obvious that that was a major influence in the story they were telling. And, they're happy that in the present people are interpreting it that way. But, it wasn't as intentional as people like to claim, and that's far from the only possible interpretation.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

It has been ruthlessly coopted by people who want to see it that way and refuse to believe that any other interpretation could possibly exist.

I freely admit that the the fact that the writers and directors later both changed their gender makes a good case that that was an element of the story.

But, this was also a huge budget action movie produced by a mainstream Hollywood studio in 1999 when the world was far less trans-friendly than even today. There's no way they would have OK'd a movie that could only be interpreted as a trans allegory.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

I really preferred the workflow(?) / pattern(?) that only existed for a few short years when pagers were common and cell phones weren't. Someone would page you. You'd get it, decide if you needed to call them back, decide when to call them back, and where to do it.

You could do it from a payphone, you could wait until you got back home, or to your friend's house, or to work, or whatever. If you wanted to stay out of touch, you could do it.

It's the same reason that the children these days prefer to text rather than call. A text doesn't have to be acknowledged instantly. You can think about your response if necessary. If you want privacy for your communication, you can arrange for that.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Getting out appropriately would have been reversing to the place where it entered the flex-posted area, not simply smashing through them.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Remove Teslas from that and now what are the stats?

As usual, anything Musk touches turns to shit, including self-driving cars.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago

We used to have that adage about how anonymity made people worse on the internet

Many of us have been saying that's untrue ever since people started claiming it was real.

All you need to do is go to Facebook to see people being horrible under their own names.

view more: next ›