frustrated_phagocytosis

Oh god the terrorism enhancement for damaging robots will definitely apply

That's why I don't understand why anyone with money to invest in ai doesn't have a lawyer or lawyers waiving red flags about these issues. It's copyrighted materials being illegally used, output being machine derived and not able to be copyrighted, the use of csam for training models that output pornography, and on and on. Yet billions of dollars are dumped into what looks like a black market with no concern for how these issues will be settled.

Everyone who said that deserves to get robbed after an anonymous person breaks all their windows

So these robots assist with breaking in to private homes in violation of the constitution? Because it doesn't count if a human doesn't break in first?

If it's using csam images to produce new ones, is there any way to guarantee that any given nude it makes didn't source csam? Is the whole thing poisoned at this point?

I fail to understand the use of the term open source when the resource itself can be bought by oligarchs. Like organic vegetables, or clean coal.

The professors who agreed to this should be investigated and shunned.

Seems like something title 9 should be used to quash, but civil rights for women are only important if transgender people exist in public somewhere

And yet if one gets pregnant, parenthood is forced upon them

Shouldn't the so-called smart technology pick up on the fact that you are driving full speed into a house? Is that not an easy error to avoid?

Dangerous? Like stealing mass amounts of intellectual property dangerous? Or polluting the environment to profit off said stealing?