It's a great mechanism for "peer review" especially in the sense that ethics and legality are often entirely different things.
culprit
Basically a jury can legally decide to nullify by declaring "not guilty" regardless of the facts or the judge's instructions, etc. This is why even mentioning jury nullification during a trial can really upset the judge and the prosecution. It is supposed to be something every jury is aware of, but that is usually not actually the case.
Fukuyama around, find out.
Jury Nullification is like the secret code of the US justice system.That's why most of the people that work for the system absolutely despised the whole idea.
So do French stoners just tell each other "80 dude" or "90 everybody" if its a big party?
Palantir is the profit-driven offshoot of this program. It's mostly infrastructure for privatized mass surveillance services. Also why the push for age verification and ID is happen alongside this.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Information_Awareness
The funny part is that the USA doesn't have enough electric generation infrastructure to power more than a small sliver of all the planned AI data centers.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/democrats-attack-hasan-piker