bedwyr

joined 5 months ago
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Common Law is better than codified law. That's the only reason we have juries and don't just let judges decide the fate of the accused. Can you imagine, in this country, judges the sole decider of your case?

The reason that the UK and US have had such cuntish law enforcement is not because of english common law. It should be noted the UK cancelled some of common law's basic tenants, like the right to a jury trial, not only afforded to indictable offenses, any crime with less than 3 years imprisonment is decided by their famously haughty aristocratic judges now.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Flour, ripe banana, water, yeast.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

0 and # repeatedly used to work, but it doesn't now, not the last 5 + years, I try it regularly if stuck on the automated corporate customer service loops. Idk about chatbots that don't pretend to be a real person though.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't the llm's know lots of programming? So if it knows and answers it's a chatbot, but what if it doesn't tell you?

I wonder if sarcasm could be used, and if you could suss it out from it not recognizing it as a person would?

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I suspect my internet provider had me talking to a chatbot on customer service. I wonder if there are ways to tell.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 week ago

That doesn't sound like Annie Archive's fault. Eveything has been scraped that they can access. If you run a free service, like wikipedia or AA, there is no way to stop them, as the law is in silicon valley's pocket. No?

We can't stop these ai companies at the point of piracy, not without the law. We have to find other ways, such as [redacted.]

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Then they plagarize that data though, using it without attribution or payment, which is aganst copyright law. If a person did this they would be stopped. Because it's big money, the law doesn't apply.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have an exciting investment opportunity for you! Because you are so naive, I figured I would explain the joke as you clearly would not get it on your own judging by your comments on this thread.

Tell it to someone that doesn't know that you have 0 credibility.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca -3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

As if you would know, that you think they would let you in on that part of the business destroys your credibility in truth.

You are either quite mistaken and not able to see through bullshit, or covering for them. I suspect the former but idk it's 2026 and mechanized influence ops are everywhere, including fully autonomous ones.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Google suppression is the more prolific cause of censorship, not the least in criticisms of large firms.

They are in effect running a protection racket. If a company pays them to not show search results, they won't show them. Ie, best buy's now since 2021 defective electronics. The only hits on social media that are even close to what you are asking for, are forums run by the manufacturers that sold you the defective merchandise.

There is no bottom to this path we are on.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 19 points 1 week ago

Ah ye of little faith. Rest assured, it can always get worse, as we will soon learn.

view more: ‹ prev next ›