Translation:
Microsoft admits AI-driven RAM shortage is eating into sales of machines with Windows 11.
avidamoeba
joined 3 years ago
At the moment - for sure. When they scale production (could be more than 5 years) they may be able to exceed the dc demand. Chinese manufacturing of anything is running on much lower margins than others. They don't play the limit-supply-to-increase-margins game. I think it's a CCP policy, as it's a harmful practice for the rest of the economy. So if they scale chip manufacturing to the point where it exceeds dc demand, they won't stop scaling because their margins won't fall. They'll scale further to increase profits by making and selling into other markets - consumer, etc. including abroad. I think the limiting factors to this future are the mass producrion of high quality lithography machines in China as well as the availability of high performance CPU and GPU designs. They're moving to solve all of those though, now faster than ever with the embargo on US tech.
Please, make sure absolutely no AI chips reach China. We can use all the cheap chips they are developing and the faster they scale production, the sooner we can get them.
In 3-4 years.
Reasonable bet if they didn't already have root on devices in people's pockets, with cameras pointing at their faces for hours per day. Along with GPS, cell, WiFi and Bluetooth location services.
Lifted from original thread.
That's the issue. It's why I've learned that when I can afford it and I reasonably believe this firm or project should exist, and it has a decent chance not to fall flat, I end up buying in. It's literally upfront investment in the thing. I'm still salty for not backing the Ubuntu Phone back in 2012 or so. I looked at it as another phone compared to what's available on the market and how the price stacks up for the features. That's very much the wrong way to do it. A part of the value it provides is the existence of the project and the labour dedicated to it. In the case of the new Pebble, I'm backing it despite Eric, and because it's fully open source and that's something I want to exist. A fully open alternative in the sea of proprietary wearable crap.
Same guy. This time the whole thing is open source though, even the hardware. So that's insurance for what it's worth.
Wait so is this about the app catalog? Because Rebble appears to be MIT-licensed open source, which means Eric can fork it and use it, even not contribute his changes back.
Either way I think we deserve some response from Eric on this.
The mental trick that keeps on giving. When government does it - it's automatically bad, but when a private business does it - it's between the business and its customers. Then all the gov't needs to do is become a customer on the B2B side.
Immaterial punishment.