The point is for developers to have control over their own vision.
I suppose consumers shouldn't have any choice over frame rates, textures, or resolution either, right?
If you want to be running a real time AI generated visual for a "pick your own adventure" document then I don't think "video game" is the proper term
I don't want that at all. That's the entire point.
don't expect others to serve it for you
I absolutely expect them to serve it for me. That's literally what I pay them to do.
Maybe give those controls to consumers instead?
Please link to the original source
Not sure what you mean. Those are both excellent examples of incompetence.
Is it really great marketing to admit that you're too incompetent to contain your own AI models? And that your irresponsibility caused serious damage to an open source contributor?
No, I was talking about the convoluted process of downloading, not uploading.
I mean it'd be kinda pointless if they didn't say that, wouldn't it?
Hack reveals what everyone already knew and the govt has already decided is totally ok.
Theoretically you'll still be able to sideload but only after going through a convoluted process.
It sounds like we are on the same side of this so I'm not sure why you're arguing with me. If they give this control to the users instead of the developers, you can use it or not use it at much as you want, instead of having entire games irreversibly ruined by it.