No, this applies to the old mp4 codecs like xvid/divx. Mpeg4 AVC is still patented in some jurisdictions.
Zarxrax
Open source ai is doing well. Mozilla integrating the models directly into it's browser doesn't really do anything to help them.
My takeaway from the article is that these "costs" are what it would have cost to actually license the use of a celebrity for every random ai social media post.
Basically the same copyright math they have been using for years, where every pirated copy of something is a loss of the full msrp.
It says it in the article, it just takes some data from the patients chart and calculates a score for the person's risk of getting an infection.
I think there are definitely ways to do these data centers that have minimal external impacts, but it costs money and time, and they are trying to rush these through as fast as possible.
Nooooo, you can't train on OUR data! That's illegal!!!1
I had thought the same thing. I can only assume the site is farming for clicks.
Can confirm I have seen tons of articles over the years of residents complaining about low frequency hum from wind turbines. Just Google it. In comments sections, it generally gets written off as bullshit or the residents just hating clean energy. Now the same scenario comes up for data centers and people want to accept it as a legitimate problem.
I dunno, but maybe being exposed to a constant non-stop noise that never turns off might not be good for humans, no matter what the source is.
Well, it's a good thing that AI is being used to fix tons of bugs and potential exploits before it comes to that, isn't it?